Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 01

673P - Project Optimus for dose optimization: Implementation strategies for your trial from the statistician’s standpoint

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 01

Topics

Targeted Therapy;  Management of Systemic Therapy Toxicities;  Statistics;  Immunotherapy;  Basic Science

Tumour Site

Presenters

Miguel Pereira

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S482-S535. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1589

Authors

M. Pereira1, O. Schoenborn-Kellenberger2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Biostatistics, Cogitars UK, CB5 8QP - Cambridge/GB
  • 2 Biostatistics, Cogitars GmbH, 69115 - Heidelberg/DE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 673P

Background

The limitations of phase I dose-finding studies, aimed at identifying the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD), are well-known, especially in oncology where newer drugs exhibit different dose-toxicity relationships. This has shifted the focus from determining the MTD to finding the optimal dose. In 2021, the FDA launched Project Optimus, a framework designed to provide guidance for improving dose optimization during drug development. The framework outlines general requirements for dose optimization but has raised questions among sponsors designing or amending trials. This is largely because it emphasizes not only analyzing dose-limiting toxicities but also includes additional safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy endpoints. Our aim is to share our experience as statisticians in designing and conducting trials following the Project Optimus guidance. We hope to clarify common questions from sponsors, address perceived challenges, and accelerate the adoption of dose optimization.

Methods

Since the release of the Project Optimus draft guidance, we have supported the (re)design of several oncology clinical trials by offering statistical expertise in adaptive designs and innovative methodologies. We developed a new Bayesian method that incorporates multiple endpoints into dose optimization without alpha spending, providing a seamless inclusion in clinical trials.

Results

Drawing from our experience in designing phase 1/2 and phase 2/3 clinical trials and submitting protocols for regulatory approval, we present a statistical perspective on: - Practical implementation of Project Optimus in trials. - Statistical methodologies applicable to dose optimization. - Our approach to incorporating various safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy endpoints.

Conclusions

Dose optimization, rather than MTD identification, has become the gold standard in oncology drug development. While this shift presents design and analysis challenges, innovative statistical approaches can address them effectively. This presentation offers actionable information for sponsors from a statistician's viewpoint, aiming to simplify the implementation of dose optimization strategies.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.