Abstract 673P
Background
The limitations of phase I dose-finding studies, aimed at identifying the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD), are well-known, especially in oncology where newer drugs exhibit different dose-toxicity relationships. This has shifted the focus from determining the MTD to finding the optimal dose. In 2021, the FDA launched Project Optimus, a framework designed to provide guidance for improving dose optimization during drug development. The framework outlines general requirements for dose optimization but has raised questions among sponsors designing or amending trials. This is largely because it emphasizes not only analyzing dose-limiting toxicities but also includes additional safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy endpoints. Our aim is to share our experience as statisticians in designing and conducting trials following the Project Optimus guidance. We hope to clarify common questions from sponsors, address perceived challenges, and accelerate the adoption of dose optimization.
Methods
Since the release of the Project Optimus draft guidance, we have supported the (re)design of several oncology clinical trials by offering statistical expertise in adaptive designs and innovative methodologies. We developed a new Bayesian method that incorporates multiple endpoints into dose optimization without alpha spending, providing a seamless inclusion in clinical trials.
Results
Drawing from our experience in designing phase 1/2 and phase 2/3 clinical trials and submitting protocols for regulatory approval, we present a statistical perspective on: - Practical implementation of Project Optimus in trials. - Statistical methodologies applicable to dose optimization. - Our approach to incorporating various safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy endpoints.
Conclusions
Dose optimization, rather than MTD identification, has become the gold standard in oncology drug development. While this shift presents design and analysis challenges, innovative statistical approaches can address them effectively. This presentation offers actionable information for sponsors from a statistician's viewpoint, aiming to simplify the implementation of dose optimization strategies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
744P - A phase II study of ACR-368 in patients with ovarian (OvCa) or endometrial carcinoma (EnCa) and prospective validation of OncoSignature patient selection (NCT05548296)
Presenter: Jung-Min Lee
Session: Poster session 01
745P - Biomarker-driven targeted therapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (BRIGHT): An open-label, multicenter, umbrella trial
Presenter: Qinglei Gao
Session: Poster session 01
746P - Phase III MIRASOL trial: Updated overall survival results of mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) vs. investigator’s choice chemotherapy (ICC) in patients (pts) with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) and high folate receptor-alpha (FRα) expression
Presenter: Lan Gardner Coffman
Session: Poster session 01
747P - SOLACE2: A phase II randomized trial of olaparib (O) and durvalumab (D) with or without low dose cyclophosphamide (LDCy) in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC)
Presenter: Clare Scott
Session: Poster session 01
748P - Phase II dose optimization with EZH2/EZH1 inhibitor tulmimetostat in patients with ARID1A-mutated ovarian clear cell carcinoma
Presenter: Ana Oaknin
Session: Poster session 01
750P - Phase I safety and efficacy of brenetafusp, a PRAME × CD3 ImmTAC T cell engager, in platinum resistant ovarian cancer (PROC)
Presenter: Claire Friedman
Session: Poster session 01