Abstract 1623P
Background
Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) fraction is promising for risk stratification. We assessed the prognostic value of ctDNA detection prior to the start of a new line of systemic therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), enrolled in ProBio (NCT03903835), a platform trial designed to tailor treatments based on genomic biomarker signatures.
Methods
Upon enrolment, patients with mCRPC underwent plasma cell-free DNA profiling. Patients with undetectable ctDNA (i.e. ctDNA level below 0.5% of the total cell-free DNA) were not randomised, but were followed whilst receiving standard-of-care (SOC) treatment. Patients with detectable ctDNA were randomised to either SOC (control) or an investigational arm based on pre-defined biomarker signatures. Here, we compare survival outcomes (i.e. progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) between the SOC-treated patients with detectable and undetectable ctDNA using Bayesian survival models adjusted for multiple prognostic factors. Additionally, the relationship between ctDNA levels and survival outcomes was modelled using a spike at zero model.
Results
Compared to patients with detectable ctDNA (n=56), patients with undetectable ctDNA (n=81) had a lower tumour burden, more lymph node-only disease and fewer cases with visceral involvement. Additionally, metachronous metastases and less prior systemic therapy were observed more often in patients with undetectable ctDNA. After adjusting for known prognostic factors, patients with undetectable ctDNA levels demonstrated an 89% (90% Credible Intervals (CrI) 1.44, 2.52) longer PFS time (median: 22 vs 8.4 months) and a 91% (90% CrI 1.39, 2.69) longer OS time (median: 48.2 vs 22.2 months) compared to patients with detectable ctDNA. Furthermore, we observed a linear relation between increasing levels of detectable ctDNA and shorter expected PFS and OS times.
Conclusions
ctDNA detection prior to SOC therapy for mCRPC is independently associated with inferior prognosis. Patients with undetectable ctDNA exhibit a more favourable prognosis and may be candidates for de-escalation treatment strategies.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03903835, EudraCT 2018-002350-78.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Karolinska Institutet.
Funding
Karolinska Institutet.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1709P - Outcomes with novel combinations in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC): ORACLE study
Presenter: Deepak Kilari
Session: Poster session 11
1710P - Exposure-response (E/R) relationship of nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell clear cell carcinoma (mRCC) from the randomised phase II BIONIKK study
Presenter: Benoit Blanchet
Session: Poster session 11
1711P - Real-word data challenging the treatment paradigm in metastatic renal cancer: Time to separate IMDC intermediate / poor risk groups?
Presenter: John McGrane
Session: Poster session 11
1712P - Real-world efficacy of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab and its practical predictive biomarkers in advanced renal cell carcinoma: First analysis from RENOIR study [KCSG GU22-13]
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: Poster session 11
1713P - A deep learning approach utilizing the electronic health record (EHR) to identify cancer recurrence in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Jue Hou
Session: Poster session 11
1714P - Detection and monitoring of translocation renal cell carcinoma via epigenomic profiling of cell-free DNA
Presenter: Simon Garinet
Session: Poster session 11
1715P - Interim analysis results from a phase II study of adjuvant penpulimab in very high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Xu Zhang
Session: Poster session 11
1716P - Primary resistance to front-line immune-based combinations in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (ARON-1)
Presenter: martina catalano
Session: Poster session 11