Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 11

1623P - Prognostic value of circulating tumour DNA fraction in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Insights from the ProBio trial

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 11

Topics

Cancer Treatment in Patients with Comorbidities;  Translational Research;  Cancer Epidemiology

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Alessio Crippa

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S962-S1003. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1607

Authors

A. Crippa1, A. Mortezavi2, A. Discacciati1, C.T. Karlsson3, M.H. Strijbos4, E. Jänes5, G. Enblad6, B. Sautois7, A. Ullén8, F. Stenner-Liewen9, M.E. Hjälm-Eriksson10, D.J. De Maeseneer11, P. Schatteman12, C. Ghysel13, J. Oldenburg14, J. Lindberg15, P. Ost16, M. Eklund17, H. Grönberg15, B. De Laere18

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Epidemiology And Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 17165 - Stockholm/SE
  • 2 Department Of Urology, University Hospital Basel, 4031 - Basel/CH
  • 3 Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umea University, 901 87 - Umea/SE
  • 4 Medical Oncology Department, GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus, 2610 - Wilrijk/BE
  • 5 Department Of Oncology, Sundsvall Hospital, 85643 - Sundsvall/SE
  • 6 Oncology Dept., Akademiska Sjukhuset Uppsala, 75185 - Uppsala/SE
  • 7 Department Of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sart Tilman, 4000 - Liège/BE
  • 8 Department Of Oncology, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 - Stockholm/SE
  • 9 Oncology Department, Universitätsspital Basel, 4031 - Basel/CH
  • 10 Surgery Dept., Capio St. Görans Hospital, 112 81 - Stockholm/SE
  • 11 Department Of Medical Oncology, AZ Sint Lucas, 8310 - Brugge/BE
  • 12 Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Clinic - Campus Aalst, 9300 - Aalst/BE
  • 13 Department Of Urology, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, 8000 - Brugge/BE
  • 14 Department Of Oncology, University of Oslo, 316 - Oslo/NO
  • 15 Medical Epidemiology And Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 - Stockholm/SE
  • 16 Radiation Oncology, UZ Gent - University Hospital Ghent, 9000 - Gent/BE
  • 17 Medical Epidemiology And Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 141 83 - Huddinge/SE
  • 18 Medical Epidemiology And Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet Inst f medicinsk epidemiologi &, 171 65 - Solna/SE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1623P

Background

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) fraction is promising for risk stratification. We assessed the prognostic value of ctDNA detection prior to the start of a new line of systemic therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), enrolled in ProBio (NCT03903835), a platform trial designed to tailor treatments based on genomic biomarker signatures.

Methods

Upon enrolment, patients with mCRPC underwent plasma cell-free DNA profiling. Patients with undetectable ctDNA (i.e. ctDNA level below 0.5% of the total cell-free DNA) were not randomised, but were followed whilst receiving standard-of-care (SOC) treatment. Patients with detectable ctDNA were randomised to either SOC (control) or an investigational arm based on pre-defined biomarker signatures. Here, we compare survival outcomes (i.e. progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) between the SOC-treated patients with detectable and undetectable ctDNA using Bayesian survival models adjusted for multiple prognostic factors. Additionally, the relationship between ctDNA levels and survival outcomes was modelled using a spike at zero model.

Results

Compared to patients with detectable ctDNA (n=56), patients with undetectable ctDNA (n=81) had a lower tumour burden, more lymph node-only disease and fewer cases with visceral involvement. Additionally, metachronous metastases and less prior systemic therapy were observed more often in patients with undetectable ctDNA. After adjusting for known prognostic factors, patients with undetectable ctDNA levels demonstrated an 89% (90% Credible Intervals (CrI) 1.44, 2.52) longer PFS time (median: 22 vs 8.4 months) and a 91% (90% CrI 1.39, 2.69) longer OS time (median: 48.2 vs 22.2 months) compared to patients with detectable ctDNA. Furthermore, we observed a linear relation between increasing levels of detectable ctDNA and shorter expected PFS and OS times.

Conclusions

ctDNA detection prior to SOC therapy for mCRPC is independently associated with inferior prognosis. Patients with undetectable ctDNA exhibit a more favourable prognosis and may be candidates for de-escalation treatment strategies.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03903835, EudraCT 2018-002350-78.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Karolinska Institutet.

Funding

Karolinska Institutet.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.