Abstract 419P
Background
Gene rearrangements (fusion) have been characterized across several solid tumors as valid targets for therapy. Their prevalence and actionability in advanced breast cancer (aBC) remain underappreciated due to lower incidence as well as the uncertainty of actionability. With wider adoption of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in aBC management, incidental fusion detection is a reality, and physicians need to decide its targetability.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed results of a commercially available ctDNA NGS assay (Guardant360) ordered in patients with aBC spanning from April 2017 till April 2024. This assay not only scrutinized gene fusions but also interrogates single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions and deletions, and amplifications across 54-83 genes. Additionally, microsatellite instability (MSI) and blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) were assessed in select cases. As this is real-world data this assay could have been ordered across different lines of treatments in different patients.
Results
Our analysis included over 58000 samples primarily from females (98.8%) with median age of 65 years. ctDNA detection rate was 88.7% with a median test turnaround time (TAT) of 7 days. Gene fusions were reported in 1.1% (n=641) of the total samples, FGFR3-TACC3 being most prevalent and detected in 0.13% (n=75) of samples. ALK fusions in 0.06% (n=34) of samples, were predominantly characterized by EML4-ALK, which constituted 47% (n=16) of all ALK fusion events. Among the total 16 samples positive for EML4-ALK fusion, 15 were from the United States and 1 from India. In this 58-year-old female patient with aBC from India, metastatic invasive triple-negative breast cancer was confirmed in Sep 2022. Initially, she received three cycles of Nabpaclitaxel and carboplatin and upon progression plasma ctDNA NGS was ordered and reported EML4-ALK fusion (0.7% VAF) in Nov 2022 resulting in treatment with alectinib. PET scan in Feb 2023 reported complete metabolic response (CMR). Recent scan in Feb 2024 showed two new lesions hence radiation was added to the existing regimen.
Conclusions
ctDNA CGP can provide genotyping at fast TAT for effective management of aBC. Fusions, though rare in aBC, should be considered for detection for targeted therapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
R. Bharat: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Guardant Health. S.S. Jain: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Guardant Health; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Guardant Health. N. Joshi: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Guardant Health. N. Rohatgi: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Guardant Health. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
425P - The humanitarian PACT for advanced breast cancer: A multi-stakeholder collaboration to improve access to treatment in low- and middle-income countries
Presenter: Alicia Annamalay
Session: Poster session 15
426P - Impact of statin therapy on mortality and recurrence in female breast cancer: A meta-analysis
Presenter: Maria Eduarda Souza
Session: Poster session 15
427P - The role of patient navigation (PN) in delivering goal-concordant care to advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients
Presenter: Akshara Singareeka Raghavendra
Session: Poster session 15
428P - Key landmarks of male advanced breast cancer: Results of the GEICAM/2016-04 study
Presenter: Noelia Martinez
Session: Poster session 15
429P - Brain imaging screening (BIS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Patients’ and physicians’ perspectives
Presenter: Ana Leonor Matos
Session: Poster session 15
430P - A novel survival predicting model for breast cancer brain metastasis based on multimodal data
Presenter: Zisheng Wu
Session: Poster session 15
431P - Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) of adverse events (AEs) from the TROPION-Breast01 study of datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) vs investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (ICC) in patients (pts) with pretreated, inoperable/metastatic HR+/HER2– breast cancer (BC)
Presenter: Hope Rugo
Session: Poster session 15
432P - Exploratory biomarker analysis of trastuzumab deruxtecan versus treatment of physician’s choice in HER2-low, hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer in DESTINY-Breast04
Presenter: Naoto Ueno
Session: Poster session 15
433TiP - Phase III, randomized, open-label TroFuse-010 Study of sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) alone and with pembrolizumab vs treatment of physician’s choice chemotherapy (TPC) in patients with HR+/HER2- unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (mBC)
Presenter: Sara Tolaney
Session: Poster session 15
434TiP - ALTER-BC-Ib-01: A prospective phase Ib study of anlotinib with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) for HER2-low unresectable (u)/metastatic (m) breast cancer (BC)
Presenter: Yanchun Meng
Session: Poster session 15