Abstract 419P
Background
Gene rearrangements (fusion) have been characterized across several solid tumors as valid targets for therapy. Their prevalence and actionability in advanced breast cancer (aBC) remain underappreciated due to lower incidence as well as the uncertainty of actionability. With wider adoption of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in aBC management, incidental fusion detection is a reality, and physicians need to decide its targetability.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed results of a commercially available ctDNA NGS assay (Guardant360) ordered in patients with aBC spanning from April 2017 till April 2024. This assay not only scrutinized gene fusions but also interrogates single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions and deletions, and amplifications across 54-83 genes. Additionally, microsatellite instability (MSI) and blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) were assessed in select cases. As this is real-world data this assay could have been ordered across different lines of treatments in different patients.
Results
Our analysis included over 58000 samples primarily from females (98.8%) with median age of 65 years. ctDNA detection rate was 88.7% with a median test turnaround time (TAT) of 7 days. Gene fusions were reported in 1.1% (n=641) of the total samples, FGFR3-TACC3 being most prevalent and detected in 0.13% (n=75) of samples. ALK fusions in 0.06% (n=34) of samples, were predominantly characterized by EML4-ALK, which constituted 47% (n=16) of all ALK fusion events. Among the total 16 samples positive for EML4-ALK fusion, 15 were from the United States and 1 from India. In this 58-year-old female patient with aBC from India, metastatic invasive triple-negative breast cancer was confirmed in Sep 2022. Initially, she received three cycles of Nabpaclitaxel and carboplatin and upon progression plasma ctDNA NGS was ordered and reported EML4-ALK fusion (0.7% VAF) in Nov 2022 resulting in treatment with alectinib. PET scan in Feb 2023 reported complete metabolic response (CMR). Recent scan in Feb 2024 showed two new lesions hence radiation was added to the existing regimen.
Conclusions
ctDNA CGP can provide genotyping at fast TAT for effective management of aBC. Fusions, though rare in aBC, should be considered for detection for targeted therapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
R. Bharat: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Guardant Health. S.S. Jain: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Guardant Health; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Guardant Health. N. Joshi: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Guardant Health. N. Rohatgi: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Guardant Health. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
383P - Clinical experience with TTX-MC138: A first-in-class therapy against metastatic cancer
Presenter: Andreas Varkaris
Session: Poster session 15
385P - A phase II study of nivolumab, ipilimumab plus bicalutamide in metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: David Page
Session: Poster session 15
388P - Anlotinib or bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the second-line HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer: A retrospective cohort study
Presenter: jin xiang
Session: Poster session 15
390P - SARELIFE: An Italian, multicentric real-world study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)
Presenter: Maria Cona
Session: Poster session 15
391P - Real-world activity of sacituzumab govitecan for metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Stefania Morganti
Session: Poster session 15
392P - Quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease progression or toxicity of treatment (Q-TWiST) analysis to assess benefit-risk of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in previously treated patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)
Presenter: Adam Brufsky
Session: Poster session 15