Abstract 388P
Background
Antiangiogenic drugs have demonstrated synergistic effect with chemotherapy in advanced triple negative breast cancer. Anlotinib is an oral multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that strongly inhibits VEGFR, PDGFR, FGFR, and c-kit. There have been no studies of compared differences in the efficacy of anlotinib and bevacizumab in MBC patients. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of anlotinib or bevacizumab when combined with chemotherapy for the second-line or subsequent treatment of HER-2-MBC.
Methods
As of April 2024, 106 patients were retrospectively reviewed. These included 50 and 56 patients in the anlotinib and bevacizumab plus chemotherapy groups, respectively. Anlotinib (12 mg qd. d1-14 q3w) was orally administered. Bevacizumab (10 mg/kg, q3w) was intravenously administered. Chemotherapy regimens consisted of capecitabine, docetaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or paclitaxel, with respective doses of 1,000 mg/m2 tiw d1-14 q3w, 75-100 mg/m2 iv. q3w, 260 mg/m2 iv. q3w, and 175 mg/m2 iv. q3w. The primary endpoint is PFS and secondary endpoints are ORR, DCR, and OS.
Results
The median follow-up intervals as of the cut-off deadline were 24.3 and 26.5 months in the anlotinib and bevacizumab groups, respectively. Of these patients, 58% exhibited HR-positive disease. There were no differences in patient age (P=0.07), ECOG status (P=0.43), or prior systematic treatment (P=0.16) when comparing two groups. In the anlotinib and bevacizumab groups, the respective ORRs were 42% and 33.9% (P > 0.05), while the DCRs were 86% and 69.6%. Patients in the anlotinib group exhibited significantly longer mPFS and mOS as compared to the bevacizumab group (PFS: 6.0 vs. 5.3 months, HR 0.636 [95% CI 0.412-0.981], P = 0.033; OS: 17.1 vs. 15.0 months, HR 0.581 [95% CI 0.3741-0.9017], P = 0.015). Subgroup analyses additionally revealed that patients who underwent a combination of anlotinib and taxane treatment achieved the longest PFS (7.0 months) and OS (18.3 months). The most frequently detected treatment-related adverse events were grade 1/2 events.
Conclusions
Anlotinib plus chemotherapy have shown favorable efficacy and acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced HER-2-negative MBC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
375P - Results from the Danish Breast Cancer Group's (DBCG) NAME-trial: A direct comparison of oral navelbine given either classic or metronomic in metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Anne Sofie Brems-Eskildsen
Session: Poster session 15
376P - Evaluating adherence to oral anticancer medications in metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer patients
Presenter: Rana El-Shewy
Session: Poster session 15
377P - Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil in pre-treated patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: A Dutch BOOG (2019-01 TIBET) study
Presenter: Niels Guchelaar
Session: Poster session 15
378P - Updated data on real-world efficacy and safety of inetetamab-based therapy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with prior exposure to trastuzumab
Presenter: Duan Yang
Session: Poster session 15
379P - Safety and efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan and concomitant radiation therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: A multicentre international retrospective cohort study
Presenter: Luca Visani
Session: Poster session 15
381P - Treatment rechallenge after grade 1 trastuzumab-deruxtecan related interstitial lung disease: A real-world experience
Presenter: Kelsey Natsuhara
Session: Poster session 15
382P - Pyrotinib combined with metronomic oral etoposide (VP-16) in heavily pretreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A single-arm, phase II study
Presenter: Jiaxuan Liu
Session: Poster session 15