Abstract 2005P
Background
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by cystectomy is the current standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC). However, benefit of this treatment significantly differs between patients, and we lack reliable and validated predictive factors of response to NACT.
Methods
Fifty-eight FFPE samples from MIBC patients obtained at the time of transurethral resection (TURB) were analyzed, together with thirty cystectomy samples from patients that did not respond to NACT. Protein networks using probabilistic graphical models (PGM) were built using protein expression data. The resulting networks were divided into functional nodes with an overrepresented function using DAVID webtool.
Results
Three groups with different proteomics profiles were identified using a hierarchical clustering. Cluster 1 was characterized by a higher expression of KRT20, a luminal-papillary biomarker (LP). Cluster 2 was characterized by a higher expression of KRT5, KRT6A, KRT14, and CD44, all basal MIBC biomarkers (B). Finally, Cluster 3 had a higher expression of PGM5, DES, and SGDC proteins, biomarkers of luminal-infiltrated and luminal (LiL). Several differential biological processes were identified between the three subtypes, being LP more metabolic and mitochondria active, B group with a higher activity of DNA replication and cell cycle, and LiL with a higher immune and cytoskeleton activity. The rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) in each group was as follows: LP 41%, B 53%, and LiL 36% To characterize mechanisms of resistance, a paired analysis of TURB and cystectomy samples of non-responders was performed. Cystectomy samples with invasive residual disease had an increase in cytoskeleton, extracellular matrix and collagen-lipoproteins activities comparing to TURB samples.
Conclusions
Rates of pCR to NACT varies according to MIBC molecular subtype, being the basal subtype (B), those with a higher activity of DNA replication and cell cycle, the subtype with a higher rate of pCR. Besides that, several biologic processes that experienced changes between TURB and cystectomy samples could be related with resistance to NACT.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
This work was supported by EPIC-XS, project number 823839, funded by the Horizon 2020 programme of the European Union.
Disclosure
A. Pinto Marin: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Astellas, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Roche, MSD, Astellas. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1987P - TROP-2 as a promising ADC target in penile squamous cell carcinoma that promotes cell proliferation by activating AKT through PKCα pathway
Presenter: Yi Tang
Session: Poster session 13
1988P - Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab (P) outcomes outside clinical trials and biomarkers of benefit in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma: Analysis of the UNITE study
Presenter: Tanya Jindal
Session: Poster session 13
1989P - Efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients (pts) with (w) advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who have baseline neuropathy (N) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM): A UNITE study analysis
Presenter: Albert Jang
Session: Poster session 13
1990P - MRG002-HER2 ADC combined with pucotenlimab (a PD-1 inhibitor), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC): Preliminary results of a phase I/II study
Presenter: Chuanliang Cui
Session: Poster session 13
1992P - Real-world (RW) characteristics and outcomes in patients (pts) with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) treated with adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)
Presenter: Hedyeh Ebrahimi
Session: Poster session 13
1993P - A randomized, phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eribulin mesylate in combination with atezolizumab compared to atezolizumab alone in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell urothelial cancer where cisplatin-based treatment is not an option
Presenter: Anishka D'Souza
Session: Poster session 13
1994P - Updated efficacy profile of the double antibody drug conjugate (DAD) phase I trial: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) plus enfortumab vedotin (EV) in ≥ second line in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster session 13
1995P - Insights into second-line (2L) systemic treatment (tx) receipt in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Results of a retrospective observational study in Germany
Presenter: Günter Niegisch
Session: Poster session 13
1996P - Primary analysis of post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data for avelumab maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with curatively unresectable urothelial carcinoma (UC) in Japan
Presenter: Eiji Kikuchi
Session: Poster session 13