Abstract 2005P
Background
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by cystectomy is the current standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC). However, benefit of this treatment significantly differs between patients, and we lack reliable and validated predictive factors of response to NACT.
Methods
Fifty-eight FFPE samples from MIBC patients obtained at the time of transurethral resection (TURB) were analyzed, together with thirty cystectomy samples from patients that did not respond to NACT. Protein networks using probabilistic graphical models (PGM) were built using protein expression data. The resulting networks were divided into functional nodes with an overrepresented function using DAVID webtool.
Results
Three groups with different proteomics profiles were identified using a hierarchical clustering. Cluster 1 was characterized by a higher expression of KRT20, a luminal-papillary biomarker (LP). Cluster 2 was characterized by a higher expression of KRT5, KRT6A, KRT14, and CD44, all basal MIBC biomarkers (B). Finally, Cluster 3 had a higher expression of PGM5, DES, and SGDC proteins, biomarkers of luminal-infiltrated and luminal (LiL). Several differential biological processes were identified between the three subtypes, being LP more metabolic and mitochondria active, B group with a higher activity of DNA replication and cell cycle, and LiL with a higher immune and cytoskeleton activity. The rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) in each group was as follows: LP 41%, B 53%, and LiL 36% To characterize mechanisms of resistance, a paired analysis of TURB and cystectomy samples of non-responders was performed. Cystectomy samples with invasive residual disease had an increase in cytoskeleton, extracellular matrix and collagen-lipoproteins activities comparing to TURB samples.
Conclusions
Rates of pCR to NACT varies according to MIBC molecular subtype, being the basal subtype (B), those with a higher activity of DNA replication and cell cycle, the subtype with a higher rate of pCR. Besides that, several biologic processes that experienced changes between TURB and cystectomy samples could be related with resistance to NACT.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
This work was supported by EPIC-XS, project number 823839, funded by the Horizon 2020 programme of the European Union.
Disclosure
A. Pinto Marin: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Astellas, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Roche, MSD, Astellas. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2019P - Disparities in urothelial carcinoma (UC) drug approval: Contrasting North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 13
2020TiP - SOGUG-NEOWIN: A phase II, open-label, multi-centre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib (ERDA) monotherapy and ERDA and cetrelimab (CET) as neoadjuvant treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and FGFR gene alterations
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster session 13
2022TiP - Stereotactic treatment with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and enfortumab vedotin: A phase I/II study for localized, cisplatin ineligible, muscle invasive bladder cancer (STAR-EV)
Presenter: Tian Zhang
Session: Poster session 13
2024TiP - NETOS: A personalized approach of neoadjuvant therapy, including INCB099280 monotherapy and bladder preservation, for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC) with ctDNA monitoring
Presenter: Valentina Tateo
Session: Poster session 13