Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

EONS Rapid-fire session 2

CN52 - Nurses’ communication barriers about fertility preservation: An integrative review

Date

15 Sep 2024

Session

EONS Rapid-fire session 2

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Cristina Mazzega Fabbro

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1185-S1188. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1583

Authors

C. Mazzega Fabbro1, A. Coden1, S. Libriani2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, CRO Aviano - Centro di Riferimento Oncologico - IRCCS, 33081 - Aviano/IT
  • 2 Dmed, Università degli Studi di Udine, 33100 - Udine/IT

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract CN52

Background

Many cancer treatments compromise reproductive function and cause infertility in adults. In young cancer patients, fertility reduction is related to a deterioration in quality of life and well-being, and to psychological problems. Although international Guidelines suggest that health care professionals should inform patients about the potential infertility of cancer treatments, there are many difficulties and barriers for nurses due to limited time, lack information and communication, and insufficient knowledge on fertility preservation (FP).

Methods

An integrative review was conducted in four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science) to identify the major limitations to FP communication reported by nurses. The inclusion criteria were: 1) nurses working in cancer setting; 2) English language; 3) publication between January 2013, and September 2023, and 4) papers detailing the educational interventions strategies that nurses use in fertility prevention. Two independent reviewers assessed each paper for methodological validity using the Prisma statement. A total of 470 articles was retrieved and identified. After removing 29 duplicates, 396 out of 441 studies were further excluded through screening by title (n=371) or by abstract (n=70). The remaining 45 articles were evaluated on full text and 20 articles were included in the final review.

Results

Findings reported in the 20 studies were aggregated, according to similarity, in four major limitations for FP communication: 1) Inadequate knowledge: nurses recognize the need for a specific training in FP to ensure appropriate recommendations to patients according to the current scientific knowledge; 2) Complexity of communication: lack of empathic relationship, cultural differences, and young age of patients; 3) Educational skills: the role of nurse in patient education about FP is not clearly defined; 4) Urgency of cancer treatment: prognosis and severity of neoplasm prioritarize treatment, makig difficult the discussion on FP.

Conclusions

New scientific knowledge and collaboration with a multidisciplinary team will help nurses in patient support and education. Addressing the barriers, will allow nurses to implement supportive care based on patient centrality.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.