Abstract 1835P
Background
Digital chemotherapy app (Vinehealth®) is an innovative digital platform that combines behavioural science and artificial Intelligence to improve cancer patient experience and care delivery. It is a patient-facing mobile app that collates information from partners across the cancer treatment centres and Machine Learning driven personalised support to enable better self-management of medications, side-effects, symptoms and lifestyles.
Methods
Patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for breast, lung and colorectal cancer were randomised to use the app or to the standard of care. The primary endpoint was QOL assessed by FACT-G (PWB) at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints looked at the improvement of patients’ compliance with Patient Reported Outcomes data collection using FACT-G (PWB), EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30 at 6/12 and 18/24 weeks, resource use data, and qualitative assessment tool to assess patients’ and health professionals’ views. 2 points difference on FACT-G (PWB) was considered meaningful, 126 evaluable patients were needed for 80% power with significance level of 0.05.
Results
173 patients with breast (68.2%), colorectal (30.1%) and lung cancer (1.7%) were recruited. 140 (77 on the standard of care and 63 on the app arm) were evaluable. The QOL did not differ between arms (adjusted difference 0.37 95%CI (-1.62-2.36). There were no significant differences between the secondary endpoints of EQ5D and EORTC QLQ-C30 at all time points. Resource use data (A&E attendances and calls to acute oncology) showed no significant differences between arms. Majority of patients found the app easy to use, useful for tracking symptoms, temperature, feelings, and medication. Patients used it more during the first two cycles of chemotherapy and commented that it gave them the sense of control. Patients aged 75+ had almost double the average total logs per user compared to the 25-34 age bracket with both age brackets having a similar number of participants.
Conclusions
Use of electronic chemotherapy app (Vinehealth®) does not improve the quality of life but patients find it a useful tool to use during their treatment. An addition of clinician’s portal is currently being evaluated.
Clinical trial identification
IRAS number, 300753; ISRCTN number 44293246.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
University of Surrey, Surrey Clinical Trials' Unit.
Funding
UKRI Innovate UK Biomedical Catalyst 2020.
Disclosure
A. Michael: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: EUSA Pharma, Tesaro; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: GSK, Ipsen, Clovis, Novartis, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel, accomodation: Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, conference attendance: Ipsen; Financial Interests, Local PI: CARINA Trial, Vinehealth, OVAL-1; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: MODIFY. S. Popat: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, User Expereince Manager: VInehealth. R. Patel, G. Kirby: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: VInehealth; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Sciensus. M. Kelly: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: VInehealth. A.H. Montazeri: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Seagen, Servier; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Servier. R. Shah: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory board + speaker roles: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Ad board and speaker roles: Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Takeda, Bayer, Beigene, Guardant, Sanofi, EQRx, Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, specialist advisor: Genesiscare; Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, Steering committee member: BTOG. R. Bowen: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: GSK, AstraZeneca, MSD, Clovis, Eisai, PharmaAnd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1906P - ESMO-ESTRO consensus recommendations regarding the safety of combining radiotherapy with targeted agents or immunotherapy
Presenter: Evert van Aken
Session: Poster session 12
1907P - Deployment of remote patient monitoring in older patients: A real-world experience from 2419 patients across 58 centres in France and Belgium
Presenter: Nicolas Bertrand
Session: Poster session 12
1908P - Grading the evidence for physical activity and all outcomes in cancer survivors: An umbrella review of more than 700 meta-analytic associations
Presenter: Panagiotis Filis
Session: Poster session 12
1909TiP - Home-based physical exercise during neoadjuvant treatment for early breast cancer patients (HoPEx-Breast): A pragmatic randomised controlled trial
Presenter: Rita Pichel
Session: Poster session 12
1943P - Updated pan-tumor guidelines for neoadjuvant scoring of pathologic response: A joint SITC and INMC effort
Presenter: Julie Deutsch
Session: Poster session 12
1944P - Super-enhancer driven NR3C1 expression promotes 5-FU resistance in gastric cancer
Presenter: Bingya Liu
Session: Poster session 12
Resources:
Abstract
1945P - Stroma-derived bIgH3 (βigH3/TGFBI) is the local mediator of pathological TGFβ activity in pancreatic cancer and a target to treat in patients with high fibrotic activity
Presenter: Morten Karsdal
Session: Poster session 12
1946P - SLC7A9 suppression increases chemosensitivity by inducing ferroptosis via inhibiting cystine transportation in gastric cancer
Presenter: Jianfang Li
Session: Poster session 12
Resources:
Abstract
1947P - Organoid establishment from multiple biological sources in biliopancreatic cancers
Presenter: Michele Zanoni
Session: Poster session 12
1948P - Analysis of cytokines, chemokines, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as immunological markers predicting pathological complete response in triple-negative breast cancer: Exploratory analysis of the NACATRINE trial
Presenter: Ana Julia de Freitas
Session: Poster session 12