Abstract 1835P
Background
Digital chemotherapy app (Vinehealth®) is an innovative digital platform that combines behavioural science and artificial Intelligence to improve cancer patient experience and care delivery. It is a patient-facing mobile app that collates information from partners across the cancer treatment centres and Machine Learning driven personalised support to enable better self-management of medications, side-effects, symptoms and lifestyles.
Methods
Patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for breast, lung and colorectal cancer were randomised to use the app or to the standard of care. The primary endpoint was QOL assessed by FACT-G (PWB) at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints looked at the improvement of patients’ compliance with Patient Reported Outcomes data collection using FACT-G (PWB), EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30 at 6/12 and 18/24 weeks, resource use data, and qualitative assessment tool to assess patients’ and health professionals’ views. 2 points difference on FACT-G (PWB) was considered meaningful, 126 evaluable patients were needed for 80% power with significance level of 0.05.
Results
173 patients with breast (68.2%), colorectal (30.1%) and lung cancer (1.7%) were recruited. 140 (77 on the standard of care and 63 on the app arm) were evaluable. The QOL did not differ between arms (adjusted difference 0.37 95%CI (-1.62-2.36). There were no significant differences between the secondary endpoints of EQ5D and EORTC QLQ-C30 at all time points. Resource use data (A&E attendances and calls to acute oncology) showed no significant differences between arms. Majority of patients found the app easy to use, useful for tracking symptoms, temperature, feelings, and medication. Patients used it more during the first two cycles of chemotherapy and commented that it gave them the sense of control. Patients aged 75+ had almost double the average total logs per user compared to the 25-34 age bracket with both age brackets having a similar number of participants.
Conclusions
Use of electronic chemotherapy app (Vinehealth®) does not improve the quality of life but patients find it a useful tool to use during their treatment. An addition of clinician’s portal is currently being evaluated.
Clinical trial identification
IRAS number, 300753; ISRCTN number 44293246.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
University of Surrey, Surrey Clinical Trials' Unit.
Funding
UKRI Innovate UK Biomedical Catalyst 2020.
Disclosure
A. Michael: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: EUSA Pharma, Tesaro; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: GSK, Ipsen, Clovis, Novartis, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel, accomodation: Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, conference attendance: Ipsen; Financial Interests, Local PI: CARINA Trial, Vinehealth, OVAL-1; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: MODIFY. S. Popat: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, User Expereince Manager: VInehealth. R. Patel, G. Kirby: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: VInehealth; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Sciensus. M. Kelly: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: VInehealth. A.H. Montazeri: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Seagen, Servier; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Servier. R. Shah: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory board + speaker roles: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Ad board and speaker roles: Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Takeda, Bayer, Beigene, Guardant, Sanofi, EQRx, Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, specialist advisor: Genesiscare; Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, Steering committee member: BTOG. R. Bowen: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: GSK, AstraZeneca, MSD, Clovis, Eisai, PharmaAnd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1843P - Safety of immunotherapy in cancer patients with comorbidities: Results of the phase IV Italian immuno-special trial
Presenter: Davide Smussi
Session: Poster session 12
1844P - 3-year experience of the Belgian multidisciplinary immunotoxicity board (BITOX): A nationwide initiative of the Belgian Society of Medical Oncology (BSMO)
Presenter: Marthe Verhaert
Session: Poster session 12
1845P - The impact of body mass index (BMI) on immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and acute care use among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs): A population-based study
Presenter: Zac Coyne
Session: Poster session 12
1846P - Social determinants of health in studies assessing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment: A systematic review
Presenter: Sofia Georgopoulou
Session: Poster session 12
1847P - Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients over 85 years: ICIPO85 study
Presenter: MYRTILLE THOMAS
Session: Poster session 12
1848P - Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer and hepatitis B: Multicentre experience
Presenter: Onur Bas
Session: Poster session 12
1849P - Clinical predictors of long-term responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in a multi-tumor cohort
Presenter: Víctor Albarrán Fernández
Session: Poster session 12
1850P - Management and potential factors of immunotoxicity in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer receiving first-line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Jesús Peña-Lopez
Session: Poster session 12
1851P - Prognostic impact of myosteatosis on survival with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Taha Koray Sahin
Session: Poster session 12
1852P - The use of patient-reported outcome measures to assess toxicities and quality of life associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A systematic review
Presenter: Poorni Jaganathan
Session: Poster session 12