Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 09

224P - Lung cancer scRNA-seq analyses reveal potential mechanisms causing different efficacy of target therapy and immunotherapy between EGFR 19del and L858R lung adenocarcinoma

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 09

Topics

Translational Research;  Targeted Therapy;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Hao Wang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S238-S308. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1576

Authors

H. Wang1, Y. Zhang2, Y. Xu2, W. Zhao1, L. Zhao1, K. Xu1, L. Ye1, X. Liu1, Y. Liu1, W. Zhang1, Z. Chen1, Y. Ma2, J. Shuai3, J. Su2, Y. He1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Dept., Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital; School of Medicine, Tongji University, 200433 - Shanghai/CN
  • 2 Biomedical Information Dept., Oujiang Laboratory (Zhejiang Lab for Regenerative Medicine, Vision and Brain Health), Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 325027 - Wenzhou/CN
  • 3 Biomedical Physics Dept., Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 325011 - Wenzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 224P

Background

Extensive clinical studies have demonstrated that patients having 19del mutation obtained a higher response rate and longer progression free survival (PFS) in the treatment of gefitinib or erlotinib than those with L858R mutation. Moreover, regarding immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), clinical evidence suggests that patients with the L858R mutation may get more benefit from ICB than 19del patients. These reports indicate that EGFR mutation subtypes can influence the response of patients to target therapy and immunotherapy. However, possible underlying mechanisms haven't been elucidated yet.

Methods

We applied single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on 40 samples from EGFR L858R, 19del and wild-type patients to shed light on how distinct cellular status and signatures may influence the different clinical treatment responses for TKI and ICB among the EGFR mutation subtypes in LUAD.

Results

A group of cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) highly expressing HGF and FGF7 enriches in L858R patients (72.7% vs 35.7%, P < 0.001). These CAFs could dampen the efficacy of TKIs by secreting HGF and FGF7 to provide bypass survival signals for tumor cells under TKI pressure. Meanwhile, these CAFs also have strong communication with a group of tumor cell through TGF-β signaling pathway, which in turn enhances the secretion of HGF and FGF7 of CAF. Higher infiltration with the CAFs caused a shorter PFS in TKI treatment (P = 0.034). On the contrary, it was an immune favorable subgroup that facilitates T cell recruitment and activation. Consistently, CD8+T cells were closer to progenitor exhausted status in L858R patients while closer to terminally exhausted status in 19del patients. And higher infiltration with these CAFs prolonged the PFS of ICB treatment (P = 0.001). Also, 19del and L858R tumors exhibit varying degrees of dependence on EGFR signaling. GNAS expression was higher in L858R samples which could provide an alternative survival signal when EGFR signaling was inhibited.

Conclusions

Both CAF and tumor intrinsic differences caused different efficacy of TKI and ICB in 19del and L858R tumors. Targeting the factors might improve treatment efficacy in patients with specific EGFR genotypes.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF0705300), National Natural Science Foundation of China (52272281, 32200535, 82172882, and 12090052), Clinical Research Project of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (FKLY20010), Young Talents in Shanghai (2019 QNBJ), Shanghai Shuguang Scholar, Supported by the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (2021SHZDZX0100) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, 2021 Science and Technology Think Tank Youth Talent Plan of China Association for Science and Technology, ‘Dream Tutor’ Outstanding Young Talents Program (fkyq1901), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFF1201200 and 2021YFF1200900), Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (STI2030 Major Projects 2021ZD0201900).

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.