Abstract 224P
Background
Extensive clinical studies have demonstrated that patients having 19del mutation obtained a higher response rate and longer progression free survival (PFS) in the treatment of gefitinib or erlotinib than those with L858R mutation. Moreover, regarding immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), clinical evidence suggests that patients with the L858R mutation may get more benefit from ICB than 19del patients. These reports indicate that EGFR mutation subtypes can influence the response of patients to target therapy and immunotherapy. However, possible underlying mechanisms haven't been elucidated yet.
Methods
We applied single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on 40 samples from EGFR L858R, 19del and wild-type patients to shed light on how distinct cellular status and signatures may influence the different clinical treatment responses for TKI and ICB among the EGFR mutation subtypes in LUAD.
Results
A group of cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) highly expressing HGF and FGF7 enriches in L858R patients (72.7% vs 35.7%, P < 0.001). These CAFs could dampen the efficacy of TKIs by secreting HGF and FGF7 to provide bypass survival signals for tumor cells under TKI pressure. Meanwhile, these CAFs also have strong communication with a group of tumor cell through TGF-β signaling pathway, which in turn enhances the secretion of HGF and FGF7 of CAF. Higher infiltration with the CAFs caused a shorter PFS in TKI treatment (P = 0.034). On the contrary, it was an immune favorable subgroup that facilitates T cell recruitment and activation. Consistently, CD8+T cells were closer to progenitor exhausted status in L858R patients while closer to terminally exhausted status in 19del patients. And higher infiltration with these CAFs prolonged the PFS of ICB treatment (P = 0.001). Also, 19del and L858R tumors exhibit varying degrees of dependence on EGFR signaling. GNAS expression was higher in L858R samples which could provide an alternative survival signal when EGFR signaling was inhibited.
Conclusions
Both CAF and tumor intrinsic differences caused different efficacy of TKI and ICB in 19del and L858R tumors. Targeting the factors might improve treatment efficacy in patients with specific EGFR genotypes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF0705300), National Natural Science Foundation of China (52272281, 32200535, 82172882, and 12090052), Clinical Research Project of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (FKLY20010), Young Talents in Shanghai (2019 QNBJ), Shanghai Shuguang Scholar, Supported by the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (2021SHZDZX0100) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, 2021 Science and Technology Think Tank Youth Talent Plan of China Association for Science and Technology, ‘Dream Tutor’ Outstanding Young Talents Program (fkyq1901), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFF1201200 and 2021YFF1200900), Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (STI2030 Major Projects 2021ZD0201900).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
225P - Nivolumab for cancer of unknown primary (CUP): Clinical efficacy and biomarker analysis from NivoCUP2 expanded access program (WJOG14620M)
Presenter: Junko Tanizaki
Session: Poster session 09
226TiP - CLEAR-Me: Interception trial to detect and clear molecular residual disease in patients with high-risk melanoma
Presenter: Erick Saldanha
Session: Poster session 09
227TiP - A phase II, open label, randomized, non-comparative cohorts study of adjuvant atezolizumab or atezolizumab plus tiragolumab in solid tumors with resectable disease with intermediate-high risk of recurrence and high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) or microsatellite instability (MSI-H)
Presenter: Guillermo Antonio De Velasco Oria
Session: Poster session 09
228TiP - FINPROVE: The Finnish national study to facilitate patient access to targeted anti-cancer drugs
Presenter: Mika Mustonen
Session: Poster session 09
229TiP - A phase II trial of a neural network-based treatment decision support tool in patients (pts) with refractory solid organ malignancies
Presenter: Robert Walsh
Session: Poster session 09
230TiP - Exploring mechanisms of action and resistance in innovate cancer therapies: The UNLOCK program
Presenter: Beatriz Alonso de Castro
Session: Poster session 09
694P - Sequential high-dose-chemotherapy with 4 cycles paclitaxel, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide (P-ICE) in relapsed/refractory male germ cell cancer: Final results with 15.8 years follow-up
Presenter: Hans Joachim Schmoll
Session: Poster session 09
695P - Assessment of the utility of CT scans in the long-term follow-up of metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (mNSGCT): The Late CT study
Presenter: Deep Chakrabarti
Session: Poster session 09
696P - Post chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) for metastatic pure seminoma
Presenter: David Pfister
Session: Poster session 09
697P - The Empower Pathway overview: An innovative approach to delivering personalised care for testicular cancer survivors
Presenter: Robert Holwell
Session: Poster session 09