Abstract 97P
Background
DNA methylation sequencing holds promise for early cancer detection. However, conventional bisulfite conversion-based methods such as Accel-NGS Methyl-Seq are inadequate for cfDNA (cell-free DNA) methylation analysis due to cumbersome operation and exacerbating cfDNA degradation. We developed a novel methylation sequencing method GENIE-seq, aimed at achieving accurate epigenetic profiling of cfDNA.
Methods
We compared the analytical performance of GENIE-seq, a high-fidelity method based on gentle enzymatic conversion with minimal DNA damage and convenient “one-tube” workflow, with a state-of-the-art method Accel-NGS Methyl-Seq. The library complexity, assay sensitivity, and methylation accuracy of both methods were analyzed using gDNA from HCT116 and GM12878 cell lines, and cfDNA from healthy donors. Accuracy of methylation level (β value) quantification was assessed using human gDNA reference materials with certain methylation levels. The robustness of GENIE-seq and Accel-NGS Methyl-Seq was evaluated with varying input amounts of cfDNA, and the impact of potential interferents was assessed.
Results
In comparing GENIE-seq libraries to Accel-NGS Methyl-Seq, it was found that GENIE-seq exhibited about 80% higher unique molecules regardless of sequencing depth. Furthermore, GENIE-seq demonstrated greater power in mutation detection ability compared to Accel-NGS Methyl-Seq. Additionally, GENIE-seq displayed superior accuracy in methylation level quantification, with an R2 value of 0.98 for GENIE-seq compared to 0.91 for Accel-NGS Methyl-Seq. The correlated methylation values of GENIE-seq across a range of cfDNA input amounts (0.5ng to 100ng) were consistently above 0.96, which was significantly higher than that of Accel-NGS Methyl-Seq (0.80). Importantly, GENIE-seq demonstrated excellent robustness with no potential interferents impacting its performance.
Conclusions
We developed GENIE-seq, which introduces gentle enzymatic conversion of DNA and compact “one-tube” workflow to improve the DNA template usage and reduce potential biases. This sensitive and robust sequencing method holds significant potential for applications in methylation-based liquid biopsies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Shanghai Weihe Medical Laboratory Co. Ltd.
Funding
Shanghai Weihe Medical Laboratory Co. Ltd.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
93P - UriMee: A novel non-invasive test for diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma by detection of methylation markers in urinary sediment DNA
Presenter: Ming cao
Session: Poster session 07
94P - A one-tube multiplex methylation-specific droplet digital PCR assay for identification of ctDNA biomarkers in anal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Karen-Lise Spindler
Session: Poster session 07
95P - Baseline-informed longitudinal monitoring of lung cancer by cell-free DNA methylation profiles
Presenter: Chunxia Su
Session: Poster session 07
96P - A novel strategy for single-nucleus RNA-seq of frozen PAXgene blood: A clinical alternative to single-cell RNA-seq of cryopreserved PBMCs
Presenter: Asaf Rotem
Session: Poster session 07
98P - Translating cancer tissue methylation to cell-free DNA methylation for minimally invasive cancer detection
Presenter: Edward Post
Session: Poster session 07
99P - Circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for neratinib and trastuzumab efficacy in HER2-mutated advanced solid tumors: Insights from KCSG AL20-17/KM23 phase II trial
Presenter: Kyoungmin Lee
Session: Poster session 07
100P - Predicting tumor ER and HER2 status using a cell-free RNA liquid biopsy assay
Presenter: Lee Schwartzberg
Session: Poster session 07
101P - Circulating tumor DNA minimal residual disease predicts the risk of progression after long-term response to first-line immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC
Presenter: Fang Wu
Session: Poster session 07