Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 13

2013P - First preliminary results of artificial intelligence generated treatment recommendations for urothelial cancer based on multidisciplinary cancer conferences from the KITTU project

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 13

Topics

Clinical Research;  Cancer Intelligence (eHealth, Telehealth Technology, BIG Data);  Multi-Disciplinary and Multi-Professional Cancer Care;  Therapy

Tumour Site

Urothelial Cancer

Presenters

Gregor Duwe

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1135-S1169. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1616

Authors

G. Duwe1, D. Mercier2, V. Kauth1, K. Moench1, M. Junker2, J.P. Vesga3, W. Seiz3, J. Scheele3, A. Dengel2, A. Haferkamp1, T. Höfner4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Urology And Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 - Mainz/DE
  • 2 Research Unit Smart Data & Knowledge Services, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, 67663 - Kaiserslautern/DE
  • 3 Translational Science, Innoplexus AG, 65760 - Eschborn/DE
  • 4 Department Of Urology, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, 4010 - Linz/AT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 2013P

Background

Decisions on the best available treatment in clinical oncology are based on expert opinions in multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCC). For this purpose, artificial intelligence (AI) could increase evidence-based treatment in clinical oncology as assistance system to give an additional treatment recommendation in MCC. Here, we present the first preliminary data for urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients AI-generated treatment recommendations.

Methods

We have transformed comprehensive patient data (107 individual features) of 1029 MCCs for UC from the years 2015 - 2022 into representations that can be used in software development. Next, we developed a two-step process in order to train a classifier to mimic the MMC recommendations. In the first step, we identified superordinate categories of the recommendations. In the second step, we specified the detailed recommendation. For this purpose, we used different machine learning (CatBoost, XGBoost, Random Forest) and deep learning (TabPFN, TabNet) approaches. Accuracy weights are determined by F1-Score.

Results

We developed an AI system which is able to decide which kind of superordinate recommendation should be applied, e.g. surgery or anticancer-drugs (Table). Furthermore, our AI system is able to suggest the specific surgical treatment as well as the correct drugs. Finally, the results show that our selected deep neural network architectures are able to learn from the limited amount of data. Table: 2013P

Accuracy rates for AI-generated treatment recommendations of urothelial cancer based on F1-Scores

Task F1-Score ↑ #Classes Class F1-Score
1st Step 0.7912 5 Surgery Medication Aftercare Chemoradiotherapy Best supportive care 0.8831 0.8842 0.5714 0.0 0.6667
2nd Step: Surgical Prediction 0.6500 5 Cystectomy Cystoprostatectomy TURBT Nephrectomy Nephroureterectomy 0.7660 0.5 0.5714 0.0 0.6667
3rd Step: Drug Prediction 0.6880 12 Gemcitabine/Cisplatin Gemcitabine/Carboplatin Vinflunine Paclitaxel Avelumab Pembrolizumab BCG Mitomycin Carboplatin Nab-Paclitaxel Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine Enfortumab-Vedotin 0.9804 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6667 0.6667 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.6667

Conclusions

To our knowledge, we present the first time data for fully automated AI-based treatment recommendations for MMC in urothelial cancer with excellent accuracy rates. In future, we aim to implement clinical trial data to enable an explainable AI for the generated recommendations.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Grant number: 16SV9053).

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.