Abstract 376P
Background
Optimal treatment outcomes in breast cancer heavily rely on patient adherence to oral anticancer medications (OAMs). This study investigates the differences in adherence rates between metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer patients using a comprehensive dual-method approach.
Methods
In this cross-sectional study at the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, 500 breast cancer patients were categorized into metastatic (45.6%) and non-metastatic (54.4%) groups. Adherence was measured using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) and the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR), with nonadherence defined as an MMAS-8 score < 8 or an MPR < 80 %. Data collection was augmented by patient interviews and examination of outpatient pharmacy dispensing records.
Results
Adherence rates were 46.4% as per MMAS-8 and 71% according to MPR. Specifically, in the non-metastatic group, MMAS-8 revealed a 28.3% adherence rate, while MPR showed 75.4%. Metastatic patients displayed significantly higher adherence (p<0.001). There was a notable inverse correlation between adherence and the severity of side effects like musculoskeletal pain, neurological symptoms, fatigue, and hot flushes (p<0.001). Additionally, adherence varied with treatment duration, with shorter periods associated with better adherence.
Conclusions
The study confirms that adherence to OAMs is significantly affected by both the metastatic status and the severity of side effects. It highlights the urgent need for enhanced educational and management strategies tailored to the specific challenges faced by breast cancer patients, especially those dealing with severe side effects. Ongoing research should focus on developing and testing targeted interventions to improve adherence in these patient groups.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
National Cancer Institute, Cairo University.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
533P - First-line treatment in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A large real-world study
Presenter: debora basile
Session: Poster session 15
534P - Second-line treatment in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: The ELECTRA study
Presenter: Alessia Cordua
Session: Poster session 15
535P - Safety and efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly colorectal cancer patients: An Italian real-world multicenter experience
Presenter: Alessandra Boccaccino
Session: Poster session 15
536P - A randomized phase II/III trial comparing hepatectomy followed by mFOLFOX6 with hepatectomy alone for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: Long-term results of JCOG0603
Presenter: Yukihide Kanemitsu
Session: Poster session 15
537P - Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated findings from a single-arm, prospective phase II trial (RIFLE)
Presenter: Yajiie Chen
Session: Poster session 15
538P - Combined hepatectomy with complete cytoreduction (CCS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) vs. HIPEC alone for metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Gabriele Lech
Session: Poster session 15
540P - Early treatment discontinuation (ETD) in dMMR/MSI-H metastastic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)
Presenter: Julien Taieb
Session: Poster session 15
541P - Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) vs chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment for microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Subgroup efficacy and expanded safety analyses from CheckMate 8HW
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster session 15