Abstract 376P
Background
Optimal treatment outcomes in breast cancer heavily rely on patient adherence to oral anticancer medications (OAMs). This study investigates the differences in adherence rates between metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer patients using a comprehensive dual-method approach.
Methods
In this cross-sectional study at the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, 500 breast cancer patients were categorized into metastatic (45.6%) and non-metastatic (54.4%) groups. Adherence was measured using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) and the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR), with nonadherence defined as an MMAS-8 score < 8 or an MPR < 80 %. Data collection was augmented by patient interviews and examination of outpatient pharmacy dispensing records.
Results
Adherence rates were 46.4% as per MMAS-8 and 71% according to MPR. Specifically, in the non-metastatic group, MMAS-8 revealed a 28.3% adherence rate, while MPR showed 75.4%. Metastatic patients displayed significantly higher adherence (p<0.001). There was a notable inverse correlation between adherence and the severity of side effects like musculoskeletal pain, neurological symptoms, fatigue, and hot flushes (p<0.001). Additionally, adherence varied with treatment duration, with shorter periods associated with better adherence.
Conclusions
The study confirms that adherence to OAMs is significantly affected by both the metastatic status and the severity of side effects. It highlights the urgent need for enhanced educational and management strategies tailored to the specific challenges faced by breast cancer patients, especially those dealing with severe side effects. Ongoing research should focus on developing and testing targeted interventions to improve adherence in these patient groups.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
National Cancer Institute, Cairo University.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
523P - A phase II study of intrapatient dose escalation of biweekly trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for colorectal cancer (E-BiTS study)
Presenter: Munehiro Wakabayashi
Session: Poster session 15
524P - A phase II study of alpelisib, a PIK3CA inhibitor, and capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed two prior standard chemotherapies
Presenter: Ahreum Lim
Session: Poster session 15
525P - Final analysis of the JACCRO CC-16: Ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI for RAS wild-type mCRC refractory to anti-EGFR antibody
Presenter: Keiji Sugiyama
Session: Poster session 15
526P - Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A FRESCO-2 subgroup analysis by age
Presenter: Maria Elena Elez Fernandez
Session: Poster session 15
527P - Effect of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in combination with bevacizumab (bev) in patients treated in SUNLIGHT by clinical prognostic factors at baseline
Presenter: Josep Tabernero
Session: Poster session 15
529P - Evaluating metastatic disease sites as a prognostic marker in patients receiving sequential treatment with regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil for refractory colorectal cancer: Survival outcomes from the multicenter retrospective “ReTrITA” study
Presenter: Carlo Signorelli
Session: Poster session 15
530P - Real-world effectiveness and predictive biomarker analysis of TAS-102+bevacizumab vs. regorafenib vs. TAS-102 in metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Andreas Seeber
Session: Poster session 15
531P - Prognostic value of liver metastases, KRAS mutations and race in colorectal cancer patients: A pooled analysis of third-line placebo-controlled trials from the ARCAD database
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster session 15
532P - G-CSF secondary prophylaxis in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI): The GERCOR LONGBOARD study
Presenter: Jean-Baptiste Bachet
Session: Poster session 15