Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 05

1331P - Efficacy, innovativeness, clinical trials, endpoints, and price of drugs with FDA approval for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 05

Topics

Clinical Research;  Cytotoxic Therapy;  Tumour Immunology;  Targeted Therapy;  Response Evaluation (RECIST Criteria);  Cancer Care Equity Principles and Health Economics;  Statistics;  Immunotherapy;  Cancer Epidemiology

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Christoph Michaeli

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S802-S877. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1602

Authors

C.T. Michaeli1, J.C. Michaeli2, A. Desai3, S. Albers4, D.T. Michaeli5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Abteilung Für Personalisierte Onkologie Mit Schwerpunkt Lungenkarzinom, UMM - Universitaetsklinikum Mannheim, 68167 - Mannheim/DE
  • 2 Department Of Gynecology And Obstetrics, Breast Center and CCC Munich, BZKF, Universitz Hospital Munich, LMU Munich, 81377 - Munich/DE
  • 3 Division Of Hematology And Oncology, Department Of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294 - Birmingham/US
  • 4 Klinik Und Poliklinik Für Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 80333 - München/DE
  • 5 Department Of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, 69120 - Heidelberg/DE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1331P

Background

Novel immunotherapies and targeted therapies transformed the treatment of NSCLC. We systemically evaluated the efficacy, innovativeness, and clinical evidence underlying these drug approvals.

Methods

We identified 30 drugs with 56 FDA-approved indications for NSCLC (2000-2022). Clinical trial, approval and price data were collected from FDA labels, clinicaltrials.gov, and Medicare and Medicaid. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and relative risk (RR) for tumor response were meta-analyzed.

Results

Drugs acted via a targeted (61%), immune-regulating (32%), and cytotoxic (7%) mechanism of action. Approval was granted to small-molecules (59%) and antibodies (41%). Indications were predominantly first- (66%) or second-line (32%), for monotherapy (71%) and biomarker-based (64%). Indications were for EGFR+ (18%), ALK+ (16%), and PD-1/PD-L1+ (14%) patients. Indications utilized FDA’s special approval: orphan (46%), fast track (23%), accelerated approval (36%), priority review (80%), breakthrough therapy (50%). Approval was mostly supported by open-label (82%) phase 3 (63%) randomized-controlled (66%) trials enrolling a median of 307 patients (IQR: 158-716) for 3.1 years (IQR: 2.5-4.2). HRs were 0.76 for OS (95%CI: 0.73-0.80) and 0.66 for PFS (95%CI: 0.60-0.72), tumor response was 1.38 (95%CI: 1.27-1.49). Novel drugs increased OS by a median of 3.0 months (IQR, 1.8-4.3) and PFS by 1.8 months (IQR, 0.5-5.2). Greater OS (4.1 vs. 2.8 months, p=0.067) and PFS (5.2 vs. 1.1 months, p=0.007) benefits were observed for drugs with a biomarker. For immune-regulators, correlations between PFS/ORR with OS was 0.70/-0.97 respectively while that for targeted agents was 0.10/-0.19. Mean prices per month were $18,822 for drugs with and $12,962 (p=0.004) for those without a biomarker.

Conclusions

Over the past 22 years, the approval of innovative and effective drugs transformed the landscape of NSCLC treatment. Biomarker-guided targeted therapies resulted in substantial improvements in OS and PFS. Our analysis provides a roadmap informing future drug development efforts, use of surrogate endpoints, unmet needs, and access to new NSCLC treatments.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.