Abstract 1331P
Background
Novel immunotherapies and targeted therapies transformed the treatment of NSCLC. We systemically evaluated the efficacy, innovativeness, and clinical evidence underlying these drug approvals.
Methods
We identified 30 drugs with 56 FDA-approved indications for NSCLC (2000-2022). Clinical trial, approval and price data were collected from FDA labels, clinicaltrials.gov, and Medicare and Medicaid. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and relative risk (RR) for tumor response were meta-analyzed.
Results
Drugs acted via a targeted (61%), immune-regulating (32%), and cytotoxic (7%) mechanism of action. Approval was granted to small-molecules (59%) and antibodies (41%). Indications were predominantly first- (66%) or second-line (32%), for monotherapy (71%) and biomarker-based (64%). Indications were for EGFR+ (18%), ALK+ (16%), and PD-1/PD-L1+ (14%) patients. Indications utilized FDA’s special approval: orphan (46%), fast track (23%), accelerated approval (36%), priority review (80%), breakthrough therapy (50%). Approval was mostly supported by open-label (82%) phase 3 (63%) randomized-controlled (66%) trials enrolling a median of 307 patients (IQR: 158-716) for 3.1 years (IQR: 2.5-4.2). HRs were 0.76 for OS (95%CI: 0.73-0.80) and 0.66 for PFS (95%CI: 0.60-0.72), tumor response was 1.38 (95%CI: 1.27-1.49). Novel drugs increased OS by a median of 3.0 months (IQR, 1.8-4.3) and PFS by 1.8 months (IQR, 0.5-5.2). Greater OS (4.1 vs. 2.8 months, p=0.067) and PFS (5.2 vs. 1.1 months, p=0.007) benefits were observed for drugs with a biomarker. For immune-regulators, correlations between PFS/ORR with OS was 0.70/-0.97 respectively while that for targeted agents was 0.10/-0.19. Mean prices per month were $18,822 for drugs with and $12,962 (p=0.004) for those without a biomarker.
Conclusions
Over the past 22 years, the approval of innovative and effective drugs transformed the landscape of NSCLC treatment. Biomarker-guided targeted therapies resulted in substantial improvements in OS and PFS. Our analysis provides a roadmap informing future drug development efforts, use of surrogate endpoints, unmet needs, and access to new NSCLC treatments.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1346P - A population-level prognostic score model for early acquired resistance to frontline anti-PD-(L)1 therapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Joseph Murray
Session: Poster session 05
1347P - Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in advanced lung cancer: A multicenter, real-world study
Presenter: Zhou Jin
Session: Poster session 05
1348P - First-line (1L) nivolumab (N) + ipilimumab (I) with 2 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy (C) in patients (pts) with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC): Results from an interim analysis of the German non-interventional study (NIS) FINN
Presenter: Jonas Kuon
Session: Poster session 05
1349P - A prospective study on clinicians’ attitudes and survival outcomes for patients with NSCLC and poor performance status in the immunotherapy era: PICASO study (GOIRC-04-2020)
Presenter: Francesco Facchinetti
Session: Poster session 05
1350P - Phase I/II trial shows promising efficacy of nadunolimab in combination with platinum doublet as second-line therapy in patients with NSCLC
Presenter: Astrid Paulus
Session: Poster session 05
1351P - Heme-oxygenase-1 (HO-1) as a potential biomarker for ICIs in patients with advanced lung cancer
Presenter: Federica Biello
Session: Poster session 05