Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 12

1879P - Effectiveness of intravenous fosnetupitant & palonosetron for cinv prophylaxis in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens: Subgroup analysis from a phase IV Indian study

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 12

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Arun Kumar Verma

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1077-S1114. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1612

Authors

A.K. Verma1, A. Pednekar2, H.B. Barkate3, P. Shukla4, S. Valame5, S. Nanda6, N.K. Shakya7, A. Hanji8, S. Patil9, S.B. Bhagat2, S. Bhushan2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Radiation Oncology, Subharti Medical College and Hospital, 250005 - Meerut/IN
  • 2 Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd, 400099 - Mumbai/IN
  • 3 Department Of Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd, 400099 - Mumbai/IN
  • 4 Clinical Oncology, Delhi State Cancer Institute, 110095 - East Delhi/IN
  • 5 Medical Oncology Department, Jawaharlal Nehru Cancer Hospital (JNCH), 462001 - Bhopal/IN
  • 6 Radiotharapy Department, AIIMS - All India Institute Of Medical Sciences, Raipur, 492099 - Raipur/IN
  • 7 Oncology, Lakshya Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, 226003 - Lucknow/IN
  • 8 Oncology, Hanji Cancer hospital, 590006 - Belgavi/IN
  • 9 Medical Affairs Dept., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd, 400099 - Mumbai/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1879P

Background

In the absence of antiemetic prophylaxis, highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) regimens can lead to acute emesis (occurring <24 hours of chemotherapy) in over 90% of individuals with delayed emesis reported in more than 50% patients and significant long-delayed (>120hr post-chemotherapy) nausea in 31% of patients receiving HEC regimen. Here, we present subgroup analysis from a phase IV study with IntraVenous (Fos)NEtupitant and Palonosetron (IV NEPA) in preventing nausea/vomiting in acute, delayed and extended delayed phases among patients receiving HEC regimens.

Methods

A phase IV, multi-centric, open label, single arm prospective study was conducted at six centres following Ethics Committee approvals. Complete response (CR) (no vomiting and no rescue medication), complete protection (CP) [CR + no significant nausea (<25mm) on visual analogue scale], complete control (CC) [CR + no nausea (<5mm)] were evaluated during acute (0-24hrs), delayed (>24-120hrs) and extended delayed (>120-240hrs) phases. Safety was evaluated up to 240hrs.

Results

Out of total 178 patients, 90 (50.56%) patients received HEC regimen with Cisplatin-Paclitaxel (19.10%), being the most common regimen. CR in acute, delayed and extended delayed phases were 74.44%, 90.00% and 94.44%, respectively. Furthermore, CP and CC were 73.33% and 47.78%, 87.78% and 71.11% and 94.44% and 84.44% in acute, delayed and extended delayed phases respectively (Table). Overall, the intravenous administration of NEPA was generally well tolerated, with only 17 (9.55%) patients experiencing adverse effects, headache (4, 2.25%) injection site reactions in (3, 1.68%) being most common. Table: 1879P

CINV efficacy assessment in patients receiving HEC regimen

PARAMETER Acute Phase Delayed phase Extended Delayed phase Overall phase
Complete Response 67 (74.44%) 81 (90.00%) 85 (94.44%) 65 (72.22%)
Complete Protection 66 (73.33%) 79 (87.78%) 85 (94.44%) 63 (70.00%)
Complete Control 43 (47.78%) 64 (71.11%) 76 (84.44%) 40 (44.44%)

Conclusions

IV NEPA demonstrated high effectiveness and excellent tolerability in a real world Indian setting, exhibiting complete response rates of ≥90% in both delayed and extended delayed phases in patients receiving HEC regimens.

Clinical trial identification

CTRI/2023/04/051951.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Glenmark Pharmaceticals Ltd.

Funding

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.

  • Analytics cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage.

  • We use marketing cookies to build a profile of you as a user through your actions on our site in order to better understand your interests and provide you with pertinent suggestions.