Abstract 1879P
Background
In the absence of antiemetic prophylaxis, highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) regimens can lead to acute emesis (occurring <24 hours of chemotherapy) in over 90% of individuals with delayed emesis reported in more than 50% patients and significant long-delayed (>120hr post-chemotherapy) nausea in 31% of patients receiving HEC regimen. Here, we present subgroup analysis from a phase IV study with IntraVenous (Fos)NEtupitant and Palonosetron (IV NEPA) in preventing nausea/vomiting in acute, delayed and extended delayed phases among patients receiving HEC regimens.
Methods
A phase IV, multi-centric, open label, single arm prospective study was conducted at six centres following Ethics Committee approvals. Complete response (CR) (no vomiting and no rescue medication), complete protection (CP) [CR + no significant nausea (<25mm) on visual analogue scale], complete control (CC) [CR + no nausea (<5mm)] were evaluated during acute (0-24hrs), delayed (>24-120hrs) and extended delayed (>120-240hrs) phases. Safety was evaluated up to 240hrs.
Results
Out of total 178 patients, 90 (50.56%) patients received HEC regimen with Cisplatin-Paclitaxel (19.10%), being the most common regimen. CR in acute, delayed and extended delayed phases were 74.44%, 90.00% and 94.44%, respectively. Furthermore, CP and CC were 73.33% and 47.78%, 87.78% and 71.11% and 94.44% and 84.44% in acute, delayed and extended delayed phases respectively (Table). Overall, the intravenous administration of NEPA was generally well tolerated, with only 17 (9.55%) patients experiencing adverse effects, headache (4, 2.25%) injection site reactions in (3, 1.68%) being most common. Table: 1879P
CINV efficacy assessment in patients receiving HEC regimen
PARAMETER | Acute Phase | Delayed phase | Extended Delayed phase | Overall phase |
Complete Response | 67 (74.44%) | 81 (90.00%) | 85 (94.44%) | 65 (72.22%) |
Complete Protection | 66 (73.33%) | 79 (87.78%) | 85 (94.44%) | 63 (70.00%) |
Complete Control | 43 (47.78%) | 64 (71.11%) | 76 (84.44%) | 40 (44.44%) |
Conclusions
IV NEPA demonstrated high effectiveness and excellent tolerability in a real world Indian setting, exhibiting complete response rates of ≥90% in both delayed and extended delayed phases in patients receiving HEC regimens.
Clinical trial identification
CTRI/2023/04/051951.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Glenmark Pharmaceticals Ltd.
Funding
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1832P - Physical condition is associated with quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors: Results from a Portuguese and Spanish cohort of patients
Presenter: Luisa Soares Miranda
Session: Poster session 12
1833P - JUMP_START: Optimization of multiprofessional care for young patients with colorectal cancer
Presenter: Kaiyu Xu
Session: Poster session 12
1834P - Accuracy of recommendations by a conversational Artificial Intelligence (AI) cancer mentor application (app): A multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional evaluation report
Presenter: Talia Golan
Session: Poster session 12
1835P - Multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of digital health cancer solution for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Presenter: Agnieszka Michael
Session: Poster session 12
1836P - Patient-reported health behaviors (PRHB) among 1850 patients enrolled in a remote patient monitoring (RPM) pathway
Presenter: Maria Alice Franzoi
Session: Poster session 12
1837P - Assessing care complexity in remote patient monitoring (RPM): A cohort study of 2434 cancer patients across 50 sites in France and Belgium
Presenter: Capucine Baldini
Session: Poster session 12
1838P - AI-based smart oncology follow-up system: Prospective application testing and enhancement of clinical efficacy
Presenter: Chunwei Xu
Session: Poster session 12
1839P - Dynamic reporting of treatment related symptoms via ePROs can reversely identify the type of underlying cancer
Presenter: Andreas Trojan
Session: Poster session 12
1840P - Ready for digital health? A national mirror survey exploring the perspectives of both patients and healthcare professionals
Presenter: Florian Scotté
Session: Poster session 12
1841P - Feasibility of wrist-worn health-tracker data to predict the need for therapy modifications in patients with metastatic cancer
Presenter: Anna Sophie Berghoff
Session: Poster session 12