Abstract 461P
Background
Although less than 5% and 1.5% of glioblastomas (GBM) exhibit the BRAFV600E mutation and NRTK fusion, respectively, these cases are significant because some of these patients (pts) may respond well to BRAF/MEK and NTRK inhibitors. Given limited literature, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy of dabrafenib-trametinib and larotrectinib in treating adults with recurrent GBM.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of adult pts with recurrent GBM (WHO 2021) treated in 3 italian centers: Veneto Institute of Oncology (Padua), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (Genoa), Ospedale del Mare (Naples). Molecular analysis was obtained on tissue samples with next-generation sequencing, PCR or immunohistochemistry. Dabrafenib-trametinib was given as part of compassionate use program or off-label, larotrectinib has an agnostic approval. Response assessment followed RANO criteria.
Results
Between 03-2020 and 11-2023, 17 GBM pts received target therapy: 13 with dabrafenib-trametinib, 4 with larotrectinib. 12 pts had ECOG PS 0-1. All had prior radiotherapy and temozolomide. Median line of therapy was 2 (range 2-4), with a median of 6 cycles (range 1-48) of treatment. As of 04-2024, median follow-up was 7.6 months. Median overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) after starting therapy were 8.8 and 2.8 m, respectively. Dabrafenib-trametinib subgroup showcased the longest median PFS (5.09 m), a notable disease control rate (DCR) of 77% and an objective response rate of 30.7%. Among the 13 pts included, 9 had died while 3 pts are presently undergoing treatment. Pts treated with larotrectinib exhibited a shorter median PFS (2.5 m), with a DCR of 50%; no patient reported a response. 3/4 pts had passed away, one pt is currently continuing larotrectinib. No grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in either subgroup; in any case target therapy was interrupted for toxicity.
Conclusions
Our findings support dabrafenib-trametinib for BRAFV600E mutant GBM patients. Larotrectinib shows lower activity than in pediatric cases, suggesting further research is needed on larger groups to understand patient outcomes, molecular characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment timing.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
556P - Predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients based on dynamic tumor-informed ctDNA-MRD
Presenter: Weiwei Xiao
Session: Poster session 16
557P - Three-year update of real-world evaluation of ColonAiQ for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals
Presenter: Baohua Wang
Session: Poster session 16
558P - Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy based on molecular residual disease detection in resected colorectal liver metastases: Subgroup analysis from CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY
Presenter: Kozo Kataoka
Session: Poster session 16
561P - Liquid biopsy tracking of immunotherapy-induced T cell dynamics in MSS colorectal and endometrial tumors
Presenter: Holger Heyn
Session: Poster session 16
562P - Acquired genomic alterations on first-line chemotherapy (CT) + cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer (mCRC): Circulating tumor (ct)DNA analysis of the randomized phase II trial TIME-PRODIGE-28
Presenter: Valerie Boige
Session: Poster session 16
564P - Short-course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitor in proficient mismatch repair or microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) low-lying early rectal cancer: Preliminary findings from a prospective, multi-center, phase II trial (TORCH-E)
Presenter: Fan Xia
Session: Poster session 16
565P - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, excision, and observation for early rectal cancer: The phase II NEO trial (CCTG CO.28) results after minimum 3 years follow up
Presenter: Carl Brown
Session: Poster session 16