Abstract 1429P
Background
There is a limited understanding of racial disparities in esophageal cancer prevalence, treatment, and mortality within the U.S.
Methods
We analyzed American patients with esophageal cancer from 2004-2020 for five racial/ethnic groups (non-Hispanic White (White), White Hispanic (Hispanic), Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaskan Native) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry, a large, nationally representative dataset.
Results
A total of 59,573 patient records were included in this analysis (76% White, 10% Black, 8% Hispanic, 5% Asian, 1% American Indian/Alaskan Native). Significant variation in tumor histology was observed across races: 78% of Black and 68% of Asian patients had squamous cell carcinoma compared to 25% of White and 36% of Hispanic patients (p < 0.0001). There was significant variation in T stage at diagnosis by race (p < 0.0001). While both White and Black patients had equal rates of T1 diagnosis (24% each), Black patients were more frequently diagnosed as T4 (18%, compared to 10% for White patients). Primary tumor location varied significantly by race, with 64% and 53% of White and Hispanic patients having a primary tumor in the lower third of the esophagus, compared to 33% and 40% of Black and Asian patients (p < 0.0001). Distribution of treatment options significantly differed across races (p < 0.0001). 29% of Black and 28% of Hispanic patients received no treatment compared to 25% of White and 25% of Asian patients. Furthermore, White patients received trimodal therapy (chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery) more frequently than Black patients (15% vs. 6%, respectively). Compared to White patients, significant differences in survival were observed for Asian patients, who had improved survival (HR = 0.91, p < 0.0001), and Black patients who had poorer survival (HR = 1.16, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Our analysis reveals significant racial and ethnic disparities in esophageal cancer incidence, tumor characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival, underscoring the need for targeted interventions which improve outcomes for all patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
972P - Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib vs sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-center real-world study from the LINK Research Network
Presenter: Jung Yong Hong
Session: Poster session 17
973P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Overall survival using real-world data from TrinetX platform
Presenter: Lisardo Ugidos De La Varga
Session: Poster session 17
977P - Transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus tislelizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Yi Chen
Session: Poster session 17
978P - Efficacy and safety analysis of transarterial chemoembolization combined donafenib with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors in for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A prospective, single-arm, single center, phase Ⅱ clinical study
Presenter: Jinpeng Li
Session: Poster session 17
979P - Initial results from the phase II randomized trial comparing TACE with irinotecan and mitomycin C to doxorubicin in intermediate stage HCC (IRITACE trial)
Presenter: Oliver Waidmann
Session: Poster session 17