Abstract 1429P
Background
There is a limited understanding of racial disparities in esophageal cancer prevalence, treatment, and mortality within the U.S.
Methods
We analyzed American patients with esophageal cancer from 2004-2020 for five racial/ethnic groups (non-Hispanic White (White), White Hispanic (Hispanic), Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaskan Native) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry, a large, nationally representative dataset.
Results
A total of 59,573 patient records were included in this analysis (76% White, 10% Black, 8% Hispanic, 5% Asian, 1% American Indian/Alaskan Native). Significant variation in tumor histology was observed across races: 78% of Black and 68% of Asian patients had squamous cell carcinoma compared to 25% of White and 36% of Hispanic patients (p < 0.0001). There was significant variation in T stage at diagnosis by race (p < 0.0001). While both White and Black patients had equal rates of T1 diagnosis (24% each), Black patients were more frequently diagnosed as T4 (18%, compared to 10% for White patients). Primary tumor location varied significantly by race, with 64% and 53% of White and Hispanic patients having a primary tumor in the lower third of the esophagus, compared to 33% and 40% of Black and Asian patients (p < 0.0001). Distribution of treatment options significantly differed across races (p < 0.0001). 29% of Black and 28% of Hispanic patients received no treatment compared to 25% of White and 25% of Asian patients. Furthermore, White patients received trimodal therapy (chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery) more frequently than Black patients (15% vs. 6%, respectively). Compared to White patients, significant differences in survival were observed for Asian patients, who had improved survival (HR = 0.91, p < 0.0001), and Black patients who had poorer survival (HR = 1.16, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Our analysis reveals significant racial and ethnic disparities in esophageal cancer incidence, tumor characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival, underscoring the need for targeted interventions which improve outcomes for all patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1426P - BL-B01D1, an EGFR x her3 bispecific antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Liu Chang
Session: Poster session 17
1427P - Predicting overall survival and prognostic indicator genes in esophagogastric cancer patients using machine learning and bioinformatics analysis
Presenter: Nguyen-Kieu Viet-Nhi
Session: Poster session 17
1428P - Total neoadjuvant FLOT chemotherapy in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma: An international cohort study
Presenter: Hollie Clements
Session: Poster session 17
1430P - Impact of menadione supplementation in the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer: A randomized phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Francisco Cezar Moraes
Session: Poster session 17
1431P - Assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A deep learning approach with voxel-level radiomics
Presenter: Yongling Ji
Session: Poster session 17
1432P - Safety of laparoscopic D2 distal gastrectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer patients: A prospective multicenter trial (CLASS-03a)
Presenter: Kun Yang
Session: Poster session 17