Abstract 250P
Background
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have expanded the therapeutic arsenal for breast cancer (BCa). Since ADCs may be effective in patients that have low or no expression of the antigen target, biomarkers for optimal patient stratification remain elusive. Identifying novel biomarkers beyond the antigen target that consider other ADC-markers such as the cytotoxin target and pathways involved in ADC processing may provide unique insights into treatment response.
Methods
We first characterized the expression of 70 genes and 32 gene signatures related to ADC processing including antigen/payload targets, endocytosis, lysosomal function, and resistance pathways in a cohort of 1,082 breast tissues, comparing expression within intrinsic molecular subtypes and their association with survival. Then we re-analyzed the trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) arm (n=52) and two control arms (paclitaxel and trastuzumab, n=31; paclitaxel, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab, n=44) of the I-SPY2 trial to determine whether combinations of ADC-processing markers would predict response to T-DM1.
Results
ADC-markers showed high inter-individual variability, subtype enrichment, and associations with survival, which could inform effective patient selection. Using I-SPY2 microarray data, we conducted univariate and multivariate logistic regression using elastic net on 71 prespecified ADC-markers to derive a 19-feature classifier that displayed superior predictive utility compared to ERBB2 mRNA alone (ROC AUC of 0.99 vs 0.87). The T-DM1 predictor only had less predictive utility in the trastuzumab/pertuzumab and chemotherapy control arms (ROC AUC of 0.78 and 0.62), underlining its specificity to T-DM1 rather than anti-Her2 targeted therapies.
Conclusions
These data create a foundation for ADC patient selection by tailoring gene signatures to key features of the ADC: antigen/payload target (topoisomerase, microtubule, or DNA), cleavable (enzyme or acid labile) or noncleavable (lysosome processing) linker, and mechanisms of resistance (ABC transporters, glucuronidation enzymes). An important next step will be to validate this signature as a prespecified, qualified biomarker in a larger external cohort.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors were responsible for the governance, coordination, and running of the study.
Funding
This project was funded by MultiplexDX s.r.o. and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under an EIC Accelerator grant (agreement No 946693) awarded to MultiplexDX s.r.o. (Pavol Cekan as PI).
Disclosure
F. Pareja: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MultiplexDX; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca. E.D. Paul: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: MultiplexDX; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: MultiplexDX; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding: MultiplexDX; Non-Financial Interests, Member: ASCO. B. Huraiová; N. Valková; N. Matyašovská; D. Gábrišová; S. Gubová; H. Ignačáková; T. Ondris; S. Bendíková; D. Lovíšek; M. Gala: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: MultiplexDX; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding: MultiplexDX. I. Comino-Mendez: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Menarini; Financial Interests, Personal, Other: Menarini. J.N. Kather: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Fresenius, Eisai, MSD, Bayer, BMS, Roche Diagnostics International Ltd, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Owkin, DoMore Diagnostics, Panakeia, London, UK, Repare Therapeutics USA, MultiplexDX; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: StratifAI; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Scailyte, Cancilico, Mindpeak, Histofy; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding: GSK. P. Cekan: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: MultiplexDX; Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: MultiplexDX; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: MultiplexDX; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding: MultiplexDX; Non-Financial Interests, Member: ASCO.
Resources from the same session
2008P - Assessing response durability and survival after second-line pembrolizumab in advanced urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter validation of a risk model
Presenter: Samer Salah
Session: Poster session 13
2010P - Trifunctional anti-EpCAM/CD3 bsAb catumaxomab intravesically for high and intermediate risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer (HMR-NMIBC): Interim analysis of a phase I study
Presenter: Aleksander Antoniewicz
Session: Poster session 13
2011P - Neoadjuvant immunotherapy-driven bladder preservation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A multicenter, propensity score-matched cohort study
Presenter: Jiao Hu
Session: Poster session 13
2012P - Role of first-line immunotherapy in urothelial cancer with bone metastases: A national cancer database analysis of 3971 patients
Presenter: Zin Myint
Session: Poster session 13
2013P - First preliminary results of artificial intelligence generated treatment recommendations for urothelial cancer based on multidisciplinary cancer conferences from the KITTU project
Presenter: Gregor Duwe
Session: Poster session 13
2014P - Overall survival (OS) results in phase II trial of cabozantinib (CABO) plus durvalumab (DURVA) in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) or non-UC variant histologies (VH) after platinum chemotherapy (ARCADIA)
Presenter: Patrizia Giannatempo
Session: Poster session 13
2015P - Serum nectin-4: Prognostic and predictive value in bladder cancer?
Presenter: Kerstin Junker
Session: Poster session 13
2016P - Evaluation of event-free survival (EFS) as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) following neoadjuvant (NAD) therapy
Presenter: Cora Sternberg
Session: Poster session 13
2017P - Intrinsic molecular difference between bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinomas and its impacts in treatment response
Presenter: Jiwon Kim
Session: Poster session 13