Abstract 1591P
Background
Novel therapies are transforming cancer care. We have previously shown the substantial rise in the number of new oncology treatments approved in the UK over the past decades. However, UK drug approval has changed substantially following Brexit and faced significant challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is unknown how these factors have affected drug approvals and costs.
Methods
The UK core prescribing book is the British National Formulary (BNF) listing all newly approved drugs. We analysed new therapy additions over a 5-year period, collecting data on classification, indication and median treatment duration. To appreciate costs, we calculated the price per treatment and equated this to the UK GDP per capita.
Results
Between 2020-24, 45 new cancer therapies were approved in the UK, comparing favourably with the previous 5-years, when 46 therapies were approved. The past 10-years (2015-24) has seen 91 new cancer therapies approved; a 78.4% increase compared to the previous 10-years (2005-2014). The past 5-years has witnessed continued transition away from cytotoxic chemotherapy (CC) to targeted therapies. In 2005-09 a third of new therapies were CC drugs, compared to only 6.7% in 2020-24. The majority of new approvals over the last 5-years were kinase inhibitors, accounting for 40% (N=18), followed closely by monoclonal antibodies at 35.6% (N=16). The average median duration of treatment is 438 days, increasing substantially from 318 days in 2015-19 and 263 days in 2010-14. The average monthly treatment cost between 2020-24 is £8286.50, increasing from £5937.43 in 2015-19 and £4090.52 in 2010-14. This equates to a 102.6% growth over 15 years. The average total treatment cost in 2020-24 is £119,325.54, almost double compared to 2015-19 (£62,343). This is equivalent to 361.6% of the UK GDP per capita.
Conclusions
Despite Brexit and the COVID-19 pandemic, the UK has maintained a consistent number of new oncology approvals. A transition away from CC towards targeted therapies is fuelling precision oncology. However, as the median duration of treatment and average cost of new therapies continues to rise they pose ongoing significant challenges.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
G. Majhail.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1563P - Increasing the earlier detection of lung cancer: A toolbox for change
Presenter: Helena Wilcox
Session: Poster session 10
1564P - Limited participation in breast cancer screening among low-SES women: A matter of engagement or of health literacy?
Presenter: Allegra Ferrari
Session: Poster session 10
1566P - Optimizing participation in lung cancer screening program: Results from the first round in ILYAD study in Lyon University Hospital
Presenter: Emmanuel Grolleau
Session: Poster session 10
1567P - Physicians' adenoma detection rate and the risk of colorectal cancer in sequential screening programs: An observational cohort study
Presenter: Li Xie
Session: Poster session 10
1568P - Challenges in pilot lung cancer screening in Vojvodina, Serbia
Presenter: Jelena Djekic Malbasa
Session: Poster session 10
1569P - Secondary delay in breast cancer diagnosis and role of rural medical practitioners: A cause and cure finding study
Presenter: Rahul Agarwal
Session: Poster session 10
1570P - Factors and impacts of delayed presentation for county-level patients with breast cancer in a real-life setting in China
Presenter: Yinghua Ji
Session: Poster session 10
1571P - The reasons that motivate a change of specialties among oncology residents
Presenter: Christophe Ducrocq
Session: Poster session 10
1572P - Factors associated with career choice in oncology among medical students
Presenter: Nicolas Penel
Session: Poster session 10