Abstract 1591P
Background
Novel therapies are transforming cancer care. We have previously shown the substantial rise in the number of new oncology treatments approved in the UK over the past decades. However, UK drug approval has changed substantially following Brexit and faced significant challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is unknown how these factors have affected drug approvals and costs.
Methods
The UK core prescribing book is the British National Formulary (BNF) listing all newly approved drugs. We analysed new therapy additions over a 5-year period, collecting data on classification, indication and median treatment duration. To appreciate costs, we calculated the price per treatment and equated this to the UK GDP per capita.
Results
Between 2020-24, 45 new cancer therapies were approved in the UK, comparing favourably with the previous 5-years, when 46 therapies were approved. The past 10-years (2015-24) has seen 91 new cancer therapies approved; a 78.4% increase compared to the previous 10-years (2005-2014). The past 5-years has witnessed continued transition away from cytotoxic chemotherapy (CC) to targeted therapies. In 2005-09 a third of new therapies were CC drugs, compared to only 6.7% in 2020-24. The majority of new approvals over the last 5-years were kinase inhibitors, accounting for 40% (N=18), followed closely by monoclonal antibodies at 35.6% (N=16). The average median duration of treatment is 438 days, increasing substantially from 318 days in 2015-19 and 263 days in 2010-14. The average monthly treatment cost between 2020-24 is £8286.50, increasing from £5937.43 in 2015-19 and £4090.52 in 2010-14. This equates to a 102.6% growth over 15 years. The average total treatment cost in 2020-24 is £119,325.54, almost double compared to 2015-19 (£62,343). This is equivalent to 361.6% of the UK GDP per capita.
Conclusions
Despite Brexit and the COVID-19 pandemic, the UK has maintained a consistent number of new oncology approvals. A transition away from CC towards targeted therapies is fuelling precision oncology. However, as the median duration of treatment and average cost of new therapies continues to rise they pose ongoing significant challenges.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
G. Majhail.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1553P - Access to EMA approved drugs in Europe, disparities across a border
Presenter: Orla Fitzpatrick
Session: Poster session 10
1554P - Co payments in cancer patients: Analysis and estimating OOP
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: Poster session 10
1555P - Estimating the social value of immuno-oncology (IO) therapies in Japan
Presenter: Tomoya Ohno
Session: Poster session 10
1556P - Current landscape of drug approvals for genitourinary (GU) cancers in North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 10
1557P - The use of patient experience in UK NICE decision making in oncology
Presenter: Noemi Muszbek
Session: Poster session 10
1558P - Independent validation of the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (Gail model) for predicting breast cancer risk in Egyptian population
Presenter: Elaria Yacoub
Session: Poster session 10
1559P - Equity of access and clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with cancer in a UK early phase clinical trials unit
Presenter: Jonathan Poon
Session: Poster session 10
1560P - Optimal age versus real age in breast and gynaecological risk reducing surgery in BRCA1/2 carriers
Presenter: Alberta Ferrari
Session: Poster session 10
1561P - Targeted screening methodologies to select high risk individuals: LungFlag performance in Estonia Lung Cancer Screening Pilot
Presenter: Tanel Laisaar
Session: Poster session 10
1562P - The feasibility of polygenic risk score-based population screening for breast cancer: The experience from the BRIGHT study in Estonia
Presenter: Anni Lepland
Session: Poster session 10