Abstract 61P
Background
To develop effective novel treatment strategies for cholangiocarcinoma that cater to patients from diverse backgrounds, all racial groups must have equal opportunities to participate in clinical trials.
Methods
Using ClinicalTrials.gov, a web-based resource that registers all studies meeting the definition of a clinical trial according to the International Committee on Medical Journal Editors, we identified all phase 1 to phase 4 cholangiocarcinoma clinical trials registered from 2009 to 2022. We manually abstracted data on the racial distribution of enrolled participants, sex distribution, trial phase, location, and year of trial. We calculated observed ratios of racial participation and compared them with the prevalence of cholangiocarcinoma from the National Cancer Database to define the enrollment factor. We then conducted subgroup racial distribution based on the trial phase and location and evaluated trends in racial disparity within clinical trial enrollment over the years.
Results
We identified 57 clinical trials related to cholangiocarcinoma between 2009 and 2022, of which 91.2% were done in Europe or the United States. Most of these were phase 2 clinical trials (59.6%). The racial distribution of enrolled participants was publicly available in 33 (63.4%) clinical trials. The race distribution of enrolled subjects was reported in 50% of Phase 1, 66.7% in Phase 3, 70.9% in Phase 2, and 100% in Phase 4. The race distribution among 1946 study participants in 52 clinical trials was: 76% Whites (1479), 7.1% Blacks (138), 8.9% Asians (174), 3.8% other races (74), and 4.1% (81) subjects with unreported race. The same race distribution trend was observed across all subgroups of clinical trials based on phase. The enrollment factor for blacks was 0.87, 1.48 for Asians, and 0.97 for whites. From 2009 to 2022, yearly trends for the absolute number of clinical trial enrollees showed a decrease in the distribution of blacks from 16% to 5.4%, whereas an increase in Asian enrollment went from 4% to 23%.
Conclusions
We noted a decreased representation of blacks, which worsened with time, whereas a higher representation of Asians, which further increased from 2009 to 2022. Strategies to implement equitable representation in clinical trials of cholangiocarcinoma are needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1988P - Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab (P) outcomes outside clinical trials and biomarkers of benefit in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma: Analysis of the UNITE study
Presenter: Tanya Jindal
Session: Poster session 13
1989P - Efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients (pts) with (w) advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who have baseline neuropathy (N) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM): A UNITE study analysis
Presenter: Albert Jang
Session: Poster session 13
1990P - MRG002-HER2 ADC combined with pucotenlimab (a PD-1 inhibitor), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC): Preliminary results of a phase I/II study
Presenter: Chuanliang Cui
Session: Poster session 13
1992P - Real-world (RW) characteristics and outcomes in patients (pts) with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) treated with adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)
Presenter: Hedyeh Ebrahimi
Session: Poster session 13
1993P - A randomized, phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eribulin mesylate in combination with atezolizumab compared to atezolizumab alone in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell urothelial cancer where cisplatin-based treatment is not an option
Presenter: Anishka D'Souza
Session: Poster session 13
1994P - Updated efficacy profile of the double antibody drug conjugate (DAD) phase I trial: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) plus enfortumab vedotin (EV) in ≥ second line in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster session 13
1995P - Insights into second-line (2L) systemic treatment (tx) receipt in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Results of a retrospective observational study in Germany
Presenter: Günter Niegisch
Session: Poster session 13
1996P - Primary analysis of post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data for avelumab maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with curatively unresectable urothelial carcinoma (UC) in Japan
Presenter: Eiji Kikuchi
Session: Poster session 13
1997P - Novel biomarker, ephrinB2 (B2), predicts resistance to treatment and poor overall survival (OS) metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Sarmad Sadeghi
Session: Poster session 13