Abstract 61P
Background
To develop effective novel treatment strategies for cholangiocarcinoma that cater to patients from diverse backgrounds, all racial groups must have equal opportunities to participate in clinical trials.
Methods
Using ClinicalTrials.gov, a web-based resource that registers all studies meeting the definition of a clinical trial according to the International Committee on Medical Journal Editors, we identified all phase 1 to phase 4 cholangiocarcinoma clinical trials registered from 2009 to 2022. We manually abstracted data on the racial distribution of enrolled participants, sex distribution, trial phase, location, and year of trial. We calculated observed ratios of racial participation and compared them with the prevalence of cholangiocarcinoma from the National Cancer Database to define the enrollment factor. We then conducted subgroup racial distribution based on the trial phase and location and evaluated trends in racial disparity within clinical trial enrollment over the years.
Results
We identified 57 clinical trials related to cholangiocarcinoma between 2009 and 2022, of which 91.2% were done in Europe or the United States. Most of these were phase 2 clinical trials (59.6%). The racial distribution of enrolled participants was publicly available in 33 (63.4%) clinical trials. The race distribution of enrolled subjects was reported in 50% of Phase 1, 66.7% in Phase 3, 70.9% in Phase 2, and 100% in Phase 4. The race distribution among 1946 study participants in 52 clinical trials was: 76% Whites (1479), 7.1% Blacks (138), 8.9% Asians (174), 3.8% other races (74), and 4.1% (81) subjects with unreported race. The same race distribution trend was observed across all subgroups of clinical trials based on phase. The enrollment factor for blacks was 0.87, 1.48 for Asians, and 0.97 for whites. From 2009 to 2022, yearly trends for the absolute number of clinical trial enrollees showed a decrease in the distribution of blacks from 16% to 5.4%, whereas an increase in Asian enrollment went from 4% to 23%.
Conclusions
We noted a decreased representation of blacks, which worsened with time, whereas a higher representation of Asians, which further increased from 2009 to 2022. Strategies to implement equitable representation in clinical trials of cholangiocarcinoma are needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
44P - Chemo-immunotherapy combination of mFOLFOX6, bevacizumab and atezolizumab after first-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: The COMBATBIL imCORE trial
Presenter: Mariano Ponz-Sarvise
Session: Poster session 13
47P - First-line pembrolizumab (pembro) + gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem/cis) for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) in the China subpopulation from the phase III KEYNOTE-966 study
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: Poster session 13
48P - Pattern of expression, transcriptional states and clinical implications of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in curatively-treated cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients (pts): The TILBIL study
Presenter: Maria Pia Quitadamo
Session: Poster session 13
49P - Prognostic relevance of baseline exosome-delivered PD-1, PD-L1, pan-BTN3As and BTN3A1 in advanced cholangiocarcinoma patients: Can immune checkpoints act as a sentinel for predicting survival?
Presenter: Lidia Rita Corsini
Session: Poster session 13
50P - Camrelizumab (Cam) combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) plus low-dose apatinib in first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC)
Presenter: yunxin lu
Session: Poster session 13
52P - Cadonilimab in combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (BicureX): A phase II, single-arm clinical trial
Presenter: Ji Ma
Session: Poster session 13