Abstract 313P
Background
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the previous study has shown a decrease in breast cancer screenings, diagnoses, and operations compared to the pre-pandemic period. This study aims to determine whether differences in outcomes between the cohorts analyzed in the previous study led to differences in prognosis.
Methods
This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 709 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between the pre-pandemic period (May and July 2019) and the pandemic period (May and July 2020) in six academic hospitals. Patients were divided into two groups based on these periods, and differences in breast cancer recurrence were analyzed using the chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and Kaplan-Meier method. The analysis was divided based on age 65, which is a risk factor for severe COVID-19.
Results
The recurrence was found in thirteen and twenty-three people during the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods, respectively, with this difference being statistically significant (3.49% vs. 6.74%, p-value 0.049). In survival analysis, the difference in recurrence between the two groups was also significant (p-value 0.0067). In patients under 65 years of age, there was a significant difference in recurrence between the two groups with a p-value of 0.001, whereas in patients over 65 years of age, there was no statistical significance (p-value: 0.491). The two groups had no significant differences in pathologic stage (p-value 0.471) and surgical methods (Breast surgery: p-value of 0.11, Axilla surgery: p-value of 0.64).
Conclusions
This study showed that there were more recurrences in patients diagnosed after hospital visits decreased due to the outbreak of COVID-19. This was not significant in those over 65 years of age but was noticeable in the younger age group. Therefore, young patients, who generally have a relatively low risk of complications from infectious diseases, should not delay visiting the hospital.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
323P - SPEN: Unraveling breast cancer's genetic symphony — Prognostic significance and therapeutic insights
Presenter: Sameer Emeish
Session: Poster session 14
324P - Application of advanced machine learning techniques to improve prognosis in primary breast angiosarcoma
Presenter: Haya Kamal
Session: Poster session 14
Resources:
Abstract
325P - The clinical validity of histological grade in neoadjuvant treated breast cancer
Presenter: Sanna Steen
Session: Poster session 14
326P - Exploratory analysis of the association of systemic inflammation and breast cancer recurrence in the Optitrain randomised controlled trial
Presenter: Marlene Rietz
Session: Poster session 14
327P - Monitoring over time of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients through an ensemble vision transformers-based model
Presenter: Maria Colomba Comes
Session: Poster session 14
328P - Real-world evidence (RWE) of effectiveness and safety of TCHP regimen: INSIGHT-HER2BC trial interim results
Presenter: Daur Meretukov
Session: Poster session 14
329P - RANK/RANKL, ERBB-2: A putative dual targeting strategy in RANK+/Her2+ breast carcinomas patients
Presenter: Michalis Karamouzis
Session: Poster session 14
330P - Randomized phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with denosumab compared to chemotherapy alone in hormonal receptor-positive, HER2-negative premenopausal breast cancer patients
Presenter: Shereef Elsamany Mohammed
Session: Poster session 14
331P - Neoadjuvant intetamab in combination with standard chemotherapy for locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer
Presenter: Mingxia Jiang
Session: Poster session 14
332P - Efficacy, safety and exploratory analysis of neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide for TNBC: A phase II TREND trial
Presenter: yingying Xu
Session: Poster session 14