Abstract 313P
Background
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the previous study has shown a decrease in breast cancer screenings, diagnoses, and operations compared to the pre-pandemic period. This study aims to determine whether differences in outcomes between the cohorts analyzed in the previous study led to differences in prognosis.
Methods
This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 709 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between the pre-pandemic period (May and July 2019) and the pandemic period (May and July 2020) in six academic hospitals. Patients were divided into two groups based on these periods, and differences in breast cancer recurrence were analyzed using the chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and Kaplan-Meier method. The analysis was divided based on age 65, which is a risk factor for severe COVID-19.
Results
The recurrence was found in thirteen and twenty-three people during the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods, respectively, with this difference being statistically significant (3.49% vs. 6.74%, p-value 0.049). In survival analysis, the difference in recurrence between the two groups was also significant (p-value 0.0067). In patients under 65 years of age, there was a significant difference in recurrence between the two groups with a p-value of 0.001, whereas in patients over 65 years of age, there was no statistical significance (p-value: 0.491). The two groups had no significant differences in pathologic stage (p-value 0.471) and surgical methods (Breast surgery: p-value of 0.11, Axilla surgery: p-value of 0.64).
Conclusions
This study showed that there were more recurrences in patients diagnosed after hospital visits decreased due to the outbreak of COVID-19. This was not significant in those over 65 years of age but was noticeable in the younger age group. Therefore, young patients, who generally have a relatively low risk of complications from infectious diseases, should not delay visiting the hospital.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
364P - Elacestrant in combination with abemaciclib in patients (pts) with brain metastasis (mets) from estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer: Preliminary data from ELECTRA, an open-label, multicenter, phase Ib/II study
Presenter: Eva Ciruelos
Session: Poster session 14
365P - Interim analysis (IA) of the giredestrant (G) + samuraciclib (SAMURA) arm in MORPHEUS breast cancer (BC): A phase I/II study of G treatment (tx) combinations in patients (pts) with oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative, locally advanced/metastatic BC (LA/mBC)
Presenter: Mafalda Oliveira
Session: Poster session 14
366P - Exploring the benefit of combining paclitaxel with capivasertib treatment in PI3K/AKT/PTEN-altered and non-altered TNBC preclinical models
Presenter: Cath Eberlein
Session: Poster session 14
367P - Phase I/II dose escalation study evaluating first-in-class eIF4A inhibitor zotatifin in ER+ metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Ezra Rosen
Session: Poster session 14
368P - Tucidinostat and metronomic capecitabine plus endocrine therapy for patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer after CDK4/6 inhibitors: Preliminary findings of a multi-center, phase II study
Presenter: Qiufan Zheng
Session: Poster session 14
370P - A phase Ib study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of afuresertib plus fulvestrant in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer who failed standard of care therapies: A subgroup analysis of efficacy in PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered subjects
Presenter: Pin Zhang
Session: Poster session 14
371P - Efficacy of metronomic capecitabine plus aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: The phase III MECCA trial
Presenter: Shusen Wang
Session: Poster session 14