Abstract 313P
Background
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the previous study has shown a decrease in breast cancer screenings, diagnoses, and operations compared to the pre-pandemic period. This study aims to determine whether differences in outcomes between the cohorts analyzed in the previous study led to differences in prognosis.
Methods
This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 709 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between the pre-pandemic period (May and July 2019) and the pandemic period (May and July 2020) in six academic hospitals. Patients were divided into two groups based on these periods, and differences in breast cancer recurrence were analyzed using the chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and Kaplan-Meier method. The analysis was divided based on age 65, which is a risk factor for severe COVID-19.
Results
The recurrence was found in thirteen and twenty-three people during the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods, respectively, with this difference being statistically significant (3.49% vs. 6.74%, p-value 0.049). In survival analysis, the difference in recurrence between the two groups was also significant (p-value 0.0067). In patients under 65 years of age, there was a significant difference in recurrence between the two groups with a p-value of 0.001, whereas in patients over 65 years of age, there was no statistical significance (p-value: 0.491). The two groups had no significant differences in pathologic stage (p-value 0.471) and surgical methods (Breast surgery: p-value of 0.11, Axilla surgery: p-value of 0.64).
Conclusions
This study showed that there were more recurrences in patients diagnosed after hospital visits decreased due to the outbreak of COVID-19. This was not significant in those over 65 years of age but was noticeable in the younger age group. Therefore, young patients, who generally have a relatively low risk of complications from infectious diseases, should not delay visiting the hospital.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
281P - Prevalence of HER2-low breast cancer in the GEICAM/2011-06 trial: Agreement in HER2-low classification between standardized immunohistochemistry assays
Presenter: Federico Rojo
Session: Poster session 14
282P - Impact of pembrolizumab on ovarian function in young triple negative breast cancer patients treated with chemo-immunotherapy
Presenter: Anne Perdrix
Session: Poster session 14
283P - Immune-mediated secondary adrenal insufficiency is more commonly found in younger patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for early breast cancer
Presenter: Laura Lapuchesky
Session: Poster session 14
284P - Clinical and molecular characteristics of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC) patients with germline pathogenic variants in homologous recombination repair genes
Presenter: Adela Rodriguez Hernandez
Session: Poster session 14
285P - Adherence to endocrine therapy and sexual dysfunction in patients older than 65 years with early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
Presenter: Daniele Assad
Session: Poster session 14
286P - Impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy on survival outcomes in female breast cancer patients over 50
Presenter: Hanxiao Zuo
Session: Poster session 14
287P - Cognitive impairment in older breast cancer survivors
Presenter: Sharon Giordano
Session: Poster session 14
289P - Low risk febrile neutropenia: Does combined chemotherapy/immune checkpoint inhibitor necessitate a change in approach?
Presenter: Jamie Weaver
Session: Poster session 14
290P - Subtype-specific prognostic value of lobular histology in patients with early-stage breast cancer: A nationwide population-based study
Presenter: Guilherme Nader Marta
Session: Poster session 14