Abstract 1481P
Background
Reportedly up to 30% of lung cancer patients will develop hemoptysis and 10% will experience massive hemoptysis. Bronchial artery embolization (BAE) is routinely performed in patients with hemoptysis secondary to neoplasm, while associated with a high failure rate and increased mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of drug-eluting microspheres BAE (DEM-BAE) with blank microspheres BAE (BM-BAE) for hemoptysis in NSCLC patients.
Methods
DEM-BAE was performed in 25 patients with hemoptysis with one vial of 300-500μm Callispheres drug-eluting beads (Gemcitabine 100mg). The BM-BAE group consisted of 25 patients who were treated with blank microspheres of 300-500μm. We categorized the results as technical and clinical success, and also included the mid-term results. Technical success was defined as the complete cessation of the target artery as confirmed by digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Clinical success was defined as the cessation of hemoptysis within 24 h of BAE. Technical success was compared immediately after the procedure. The clinical success and mid-term results (percentage of patients who were free of hemoptysis) were compared at 1 and 6 months after the procedure, respectively.
Results
There was no significant difference for technical success rates (DEM-BAE group: 90%, BM-BAE group: 85%, P>0.05). However, the clinical success rates (DEM-BAE group: 83.3%, BM-BAE group: 68%, P<0.01) and the mid-term results (DEM-BAE group: 71.4%, BM-BAE group: 64%, P<0.01) showed a significant difference. Moreover, Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was higher in DEM-BAE group than control group (DEM-BAE group: 78.5%, BM-BAE group: 48%, P<0.01). The procedure-related complications included mild cough and mild chest pain. There was no special management required for these complications.
Conclusions
DEM-BAE appeared to be the more optimal modality to improve the mid-term clinical efficacy compared to blank microspheres BAE for hemoptysis in NSCLC patients. Further studies were warranted.
Clinical trial identification
ChiCTR2300071106.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1574P - Medical oncology residents mentors (MORM): A target for resiliency interventions
Presenter: David Paez
Session: Poster session 10
1575P - Smoke-free policies in outdoor areas: A potential cancer prevention strategy in Spain
Presenter: Karen Ramírez Cervantes
Session: Poster session 10
1576P - Smoking and lung cancer mortality in Italian men and women: 2003-2019
Presenter: Diego Serraino
Session: Poster session 10
1577P - Indoor radon in patients with lung cancer in Spain: Preliminary data from the MIRROR study
Presenter: Marta Garcia De Herreros
Session: Poster session 10
1578P - Perception of LMIC oncologists on meaningful cancer trial endpoints and value of cancer drugs
Presenter: Soumitra Shankar Datta
Session: Poster session 10
1579P - The Dutch national adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer care network, a data driven learning healthcare system
Presenter: Winette Van Der Graaf
Session: Poster session 10
1580P - Impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) on disparities in next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing in cancer patients (pts) in the US
Presenter: Chadi Hage Chehade
Session: Poster session 10
1581P - AI enabled intervention increased real-world guideline compliant care: Improving genomic testing and cascade genetics for women with ovarian cancer (OC)
Presenter: Premal Thaker
Session: Poster session 10
1582P - Pregnancy and miscarriage in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients harboring mutational signature of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)
Presenter: Lorena Incorvaia
Session: Poster session 10
1583P - Trial-level surrogacy of intermediate endpoints in adjuvant or neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint blockade
Presenter: Luís Leite
Session: Poster session 10