Abstract 1481P
Background
Reportedly up to 30% of lung cancer patients will develop hemoptysis and 10% will experience massive hemoptysis. Bronchial artery embolization (BAE) is routinely performed in patients with hemoptysis secondary to neoplasm, while associated with a high failure rate and increased mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of drug-eluting microspheres BAE (DEM-BAE) with blank microspheres BAE (BM-BAE) for hemoptysis in NSCLC patients.
Methods
DEM-BAE was performed in 25 patients with hemoptysis with one vial of 300-500μm Callispheres drug-eluting beads (Gemcitabine 100mg). The BM-BAE group consisted of 25 patients who were treated with blank microspheres of 300-500μm. We categorized the results as technical and clinical success, and also included the mid-term results. Technical success was defined as the complete cessation of the target artery as confirmed by digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Clinical success was defined as the cessation of hemoptysis within 24 h of BAE. Technical success was compared immediately after the procedure. The clinical success and mid-term results (percentage of patients who were free of hemoptysis) were compared at 1 and 6 months after the procedure, respectively.
Results
There was no significant difference for technical success rates (DEM-BAE group: 90%, BM-BAE group: 85%, P>0.05). However, the clinical success rates (DEM-BAE group: 83.3%, BM-BAE group: 68%, P<0.01) and the mid-term results (DEM-BAE group: 71.4%, BM-BAE group: 64%, P<0.01) showed a significant difference. Moreover, Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was higher in DEM-BAE group than control group (DEM-BAE group: 78.5%, BM-BAE group: 48%, P<0.01). The procedure-related complications included mild cough and mild chest pain. There was no special management required for these complications.
Conclusions
DEM-BAE appeared to be the more optimal modality to improve the mid-term clinical efficacy compared to blank microspheres BAE for hemoptysis in NSCLC patients. Further studies were warranted.
Clinical trial identification
ChiCTR2300071106.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1482P - Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) for palliation of jaundice in patients of unresectable/disseminated carcinoma gall bladder with hilar block: Is it a worthwhile enterprise?
Presenter: Saurabh Galodha
Session: Poster session 10
1484P - Inflammatory patterns of ascites in patients with solid tumors
Presenter: Julia Berger
Session: Poster session 10
1485P - Mitigating symptom clusters of patients with metastatic cancer through a remote physical exercise program (EXIO)
Presenter: Paulo Bergerot
Session: Poster session 10
1486P - A personalized rehabilitation pilot program for improving QOL of unresectable metastatic lung cancer patients
Presenter: Shani Shilo
Session: Poster session 10
1487P - Telemonitoring system effectiveness for alleviating cancer pain in patients with advanced cancer
Presenter: Shiori Yoshida
Session: Poster session 10
1488P - Use of mobile app “SUPPORT+” to enhance community palliative care in advanced cancer patients: A feasibility study
Presenter: Wendy Chan
Session: Poster session 10
1489P - Factors influencing adherence to electronic patient-reported outcomes in palliative cancer care
Presenter: Sarah Gomes
Session: Poster session 10
1490P - Health-related quality of life of cancer patients on chemotherapy and its relationship with caregiver strain: A cross-sectional analytical study
Presenter: Herald Mapa
Session: Poster session 10
Resources:
Abstract
1491P - Palliative care of E-warm model for driver-gene-negative non-small cell lung cancer patients: A single-center randomized controlled trial
Presenter: Junhui Zhang
Session: Poster session 10
Resources:
Abstract