Abstract 1481P
Background
Reportedly up to 30% of lung cancer patients will develop hemoptysis and 10% will experience massive hemoptysis. Bronchial artery embolization (BAE) is routinely performed in patients with hemoptysis secondary to neoplasm, while associated with a high failure rate and increased mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of drug-eluting microspheres BAE (DEM-BAE) with blank microspheres BAE (BM-BAE) for hemoptysis in NSCLC patients.
Methods
DEM-BAE was performed in 25 patients with hemoptysis with one vial of 300-500μm Callispheres drug-eluting beads (Gemcitabine 100mg). The BM-BAE group consisted of 25 patients who were treated with blank microspheres of 300-500μm. We categorized the results as technical and clinical success, and also included the mid-term results. Technical success was defined as the complete cessation of the target artery as confirmed by digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Clinical success was defined as the cessation of hemoptysis within 24 h of BAE. Technical success was compared immediately after the procedure. The clinical success and mid-term results (percentage of patients who were free of hemoptysis) were compared at 1 and 6 months after the procedure, respectively.
Results
There was no significant difference for technical success rates (DEM-BAE group: 90%, BM-BAE group: 85%, P>0.05). However, the clinical success rates (DEM-BAE group: 83.3%, BM-BAE group: 68%, P<0.01) and the mid-term results (DEM-BAE group: 71.4%, BM-BAE group: 64%, P<0.01) showed a significant difference. Moreover, Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was higher in DEM-BAE group than control group (DEM-BAE group: 78.5%, BM-BAE group: 48%, P<0.01). The procedure-related complications included mild cough and mild chest pain. There was no special management required for these complications.
Conclusions
DEM-BAE appeared to be the more optimal modality to improve the mid-term clinical efficacy compared to blank microspheres BAE for hemoptysis in NSCLC patients. Further studies were warranted.
Clinical trial identification
ChiCTR2300071106.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1492P - The role of LACE index in predicting 30-day unplanned readmission in patients receiving immunotherapy
Presenter: Duygu Ercan Uzundal
Session: Poster session 10
1493P - The Italian version of the FAMCARE-P13 questionnaire: A validation study
Presenter: Giacomo Massa
Session: Poster session 10
1494P - Prognostic features in NSCLC patients with ECOG-PS 2-4: A prospective cohort study
Presenter: Gilberto De Castro Jr.
Session: Poster session 10
1495P - Impact of social isolation on the clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients
Presenter: Yoh Yamaguchi
Session: Poster session 10
1496P - Predictors of early mortality after hemodialysis in patients with cancer and acute kidney injury
Presenter: Suleyman Cagin Gurbuz
Session: Poster session 10
1497P - Resuscitation decisions in advanced cancer: A mixed methods study exploring survival outcomes and views of healthcare professionals
Presenter: Rachel Prichard
Session: Poster session 10
1498P - Acute myeloid leukemia: Trends in palliative care utilization in hospitalized patients over 65 years old - A national inpatient sample study (2016-2020)
Presenter: Marco Bermudez
Session: Poster session 10
Resources:
Abstract
1499P - Knowledge, attitudes, and current practices toward lung cancer palliative care management in China: A national survey
Presenter: Mengting Chen
Session: Poster session 10
Resources:
Abstract
1500P - Caring for carers: The impact of death & dying on doctors-in-training in an Irish tertiary referral hospital
Presenter: Conor Moloney
Session: Poster session 10
1501P - Sex-specific variation in symptoms presentation: Experience of an outpatient clinic integrated model between radiotherapy and palliative care
Presenter: Luca Tontini
Session: Poster session 10