Abstract 1954P
Background
Uveal melanoma is the most prevalent intra-ocular tumor among adults, with nearly half of the patients developing metastatic disease. Treatment options are limited to Tebentafusp in patients with HLA-A*02:01 mutation with immunotherapy and chemotherapy yielding poor results. 5-Methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP), a key enzyme in the methionine salvage pathway, has emerged as a biomarker for synthetic lethality-based trials featuring Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5). In a recent phase I trial of a PRMT5 inhibitor, PRT811, clinical activity was described in cases of CAUM.
Methods
676 CAUM and 9666 CASM patients underwent hybrid capture based CGP to evaluate genomic alterations (GA). Microsatellite instability high status (MSIH), tumor mutation burden (TMB), homologous recombination defect (HRD) score, genomic ancestry and genomic signature were determined from the sequencing data. PD-L1 was determined by immunohistochemistry (Dako 22C3).
Results
CAUM patients when compared to clinically advanced skin melanoma (CASM) patients were more often female (53.7% vs 36.7%), and younger (median age 64 vs 66). CAUM had lower frequency of UV-light exposure signature (2.5% vs 55.9%), GA/tumor frequency (3 vs 6), and TMB>10mutations/Mb (4.1% vs 58%). CAUM had lower frequency of BRAF GA (13.3% vs 44.4%), MTAP loss associated with 9p chromosomal loss and CDKN2A/B (4% vs 15.5%). CAUM associated GA in GNA11 (44.1%) and GNAQ (46.2%) were rarely identified in CASM (1.0% or less). GA more frequent in CAUM included BAP1 (53.1% vs 1.7%), MYC (33.6% vs 4.0%), while in CASM included KIT (5.4% vs 0.7%), NF1 (21.0% vs 2.1%), and TERT (24.6% vs 4.0%). These differences were statistically significant (p<0.0001). Any level of PD-L1 expression was higher in CASM (43.8% vs 26.1%; p=0.0007). Both groups were noted to have 93% European ancestry and neither group had MSIH cases.
Conclusions
Although MTAP loss is less frequent in CAUM than in CASM, the recent evidence that this genomic alteration predicts responsiveness to PRMT5 inhibition is noteworthy. This highlights the importance of further investigating this biomarker for patients with this rare and clinically aggressive type of cancer.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
SUNY Upstate Medical University.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
D.C. Pavlick: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Foundation Medicine, Inc; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG. J.S. Ross: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Medical Director: Foundation Medicine; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Roche Holdings, Tango Therapeutics, Celsius Therapeutics. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1988P - Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab (P) outcomes outside clinical trials and biomarkers of benefit in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma: Analysis of the UNITE study
Presenter: Tanya Jindal
Session: Poster session 13
1989P - Efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients (pts) with (w) advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who have baseline neuropathy (N) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM): A UNITE study analysis
Presenter: Albert Jang
Session: Poster session 13
1990P - MRG002-HER2 ADC combined with pucotenlimab (a PD-1 inhibitor), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC): Preliminary results of a phase I/II study
Presenter: Chuanliang Cui
Session: Poster session 13
1992P - Real-world (RW) characteristics and outcomes in patients (pts) with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) treated with adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)
Presenter: Hedyeh Ebrahimi
Session: Poster session 13
1993P - A randomized, phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eribulin mesylate in combination with atezolizumab compared to atezolizumab alone in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell urothelial cancer where cisplatin-based treatment is not an option
Presenter: Anishka D'Souza
Session: Poster session 13
1994P - Updated efficacy profile of the double antibody drug conjugate (DAD) phase I trial: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) plus enfortumab vedotin (EV) in ≥ second line in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster session 13
1995P - Insights into second-line (2L) systemic treatment (tx) receipt in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Results of a retrospective observational study in Germany
Presenter: Günter Niegisch
Session: Poster session 13
1996P - Primary analysis of post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data for avelumab maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with curatively unresectable urothelial carcinoma (UC) in Japan
Presenter: Eiji Kikuchi
Session: Poster session 13
1997P - Novel biomarker, ephrinB2 (B2), predicts resistance to treatment and poor overall survival (OS) metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Sarmad Sadeghi
Session: Poster session 13