Abstract 1954P
Background
Uveal melanoma is the most prevalent intra-ocular tumor among adults, with nearly half of the patients developing metastatic disease. Treatment options are limited to Tebentafusp in patients with HLA-A*02:01 mutation with immunotherapy and chemotherapy yielding poor results. 5-Methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP), a key enzyme in the methionine salvage pathway, has emerged as a biomarker for synthetic lethality-based trials featuring Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5). In a recent phase I trial of a PRMT5 inhibitor, PRT811, clinical activity was described in cases of CAUM.
Methods
676 CAUM and 9666 CASM patients underwent hybrid capture based CGP to evaluate genomic alterations (GA). Microsatellite instability high status (MSIH), tumor mutation burden (TMB), homologous recombination defect (HRD) score, genomic ancestry and genomic signature were determined from the sequencing data. PD-L1 was determined by immunohistochemistry (Dako 22C3).
Results
CAUM patients when compared to clinically advanced skin melanoma (CASM) patients were more often female (53.7% vs 36.7%), and younger (median age 64 vs 66). CAUM had lower frequency of UV-light exposure signature (2.5% vs 55.9%), GA/tumor frequency (3 vs 6), and TMB>10mutations/Mb (4.1% vs 58%). CAUM had lower frequency of BRAF GA (13.3% vs 44.4%), MTAP loss associated with 9p chromosomal loss and CDKN2A/B (4% vs 15.5%). CAUM associated GA in GNA11 (44.1%) and GNAQ (46.2%) were rarely identified in CASM (1.0% or less). GA more frequent in CAUM included BAP1 (53.1% vs 1.7%), MYC (33.6% vs 4.0%), while in CASM included KIT (5.4% vs 0.7%), NF1 (21.0% vs 2.1%), and TERT (24.6% vs 4.0%). These differences were statistically significant (p<0.0001). Any level of PD-L1 expression was higher in CASM (43.8% vs 26.1%; p=0.0007). Both groups were noted to have 93% European ancestry and neither group had MSIH cases.
Conclusions
Although MTAP loss is less frequent in CAUM than in CASM, the recent evidence that this genomic alteration predicts responsiveness to PRMT5 inhibition is noteworthy. This highlights the importance of further investigating this biomarker for patients with this rare and clinically aggressive type of cancer.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
SUNY Upstate Medical University.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
D.C. Pavlick: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Foundation Medicine, Inc; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG. J.S. Ross: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Medical Director: Foundation Medicine; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Roche Holdings, Tango Therapeutics, Celsius Therapeutics. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2019P - Disparities in urothelial carcinoma (UC) drug approval: Contrasting North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 13
2020TiP - SOGUG-NEOWIN: A phase II, open-label, multi-centre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib (ERDA) monotherapy and ERDA and cetrelimab (CET) as neoadjuvant treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and FGFR gene alterations
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster session 13
2022TiP - Stereotactic treatment with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and enfortumab vedotin: A phase I/II study for localized, cisplatin ineligible, muscle invasive bladder cancer (STAR-EV)
Presenter: Tian Zhang
Session: Poster session 13
2024TiP - NETOS: A personalized approach of neoadjuvant therapy, including INCB099280 monotherapy and bladder preservation, for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC) with ctDNA monitoring
Presenter: Valentina Tateo
Session: Poster session 13