Abstract 1670P
Background
PDAC is highly associated with thrombotic risk, with reported incidences up to 40%. Although tumoral (TT) and non-tumoral thrombosis (nonTT) are frequently treated equally, they might have different impact in prognosis and survival. Khorana and ONKOTEV score can predict thrombotic risk in this scenario.
Methods
Retrospective study that includes 204 patients with PDAC treated with chemotherapy and visited in the Medical Oncology Department of a third-level hospital in Barcelona between January 2014 and December 2021. The main objective was to describe the frequency of TT and nonTT, the ability to predict thrombotic risk by predictive scores using ROC curve and to analyze survival associated with thrombosis and rethrombosis.
Results
We identified 62 patients with thrombosis (30.4%) of a total of 204. Median age was 70 years (48-92), 54.8% were males, and 62% presented stage IV at diagnosis. TT involved 71% of thrombotic events being the most frequent in all stages (80% in resectable, 83.3% in borderline, 75% in locally advanced and 66.7% in metastatic disease). Predominant thrombotic events were splenic (39%) and superior mesenteric vein (32%) for TT and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in lower extremities and pulmonary embolisms in non-tumoral scenario (56% and 22.2% respectively). The ONKOTEV score presented better predictive capacity compared to Khorana for nonTT (AUC 0.731 vs 0,670 in ROC curves). Neither of both scores demonstrated predictive capacity for TT (AUC 0.540 vs 0.495). Thromboembolic events were associated with reduced overall survival (OS; HR 0.71, p 0.034). Median OS was 12.5 months in patients who presented nonTT vs 7.2 months for those with TT (HR 0.48, p=0.326). Rethrombosis occurred in 8% (5 cases), 2 of them being on anticoagulant therapy. All were in the same location as previously.
Conclusions
TT was more frequent than nonTT in our cohort. Thromboembolic events, including TT and nonTT, were detrimental for survival without statistically significant differences between them. ONKOTEV score has a greater capacity to predict nonTT compared to Khorana, in order to identify patients who could potentially benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1624P - Predictive factors for treatment success of second-line Nal-IRI/5-FU/FA in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (AIO-PAK-0216)
Presenter: Manfred Lutz
Session: Poster session 22
1626P - A novel endoscopic ultrasound guided extended-release siRNA implant targeting KRASG12D/V in localized pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Anna Varghese
Session: Poster session 22
1629P - Modified-FOLFIRINOX-losartan followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A phase II study
Presenter: Alshaimaa Alhanafy
Session: Poster session 22
1630P - Phase I/Ib study of SHP2-ERK inhibition in KRASm pancreatic cancer (SHERPA trial) and preclinical identification of potential resistance markers
Presenter: Ashwini Cheryl Kanhailal
Session: Poster session 22
1631P - Phase I study of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided NBTXR3 delivery activated by radiotherapy (RT) for locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC or BRPC)
Presenter: Gabriela Fuentes
Session: Poster session 22
1632P - Organoids as tools for functional precision oncology in advanced pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Alice Boileve
Session: Poster session 22
1633P - Development and clinical validation of news transcriptomic tools for predicting the response to individual drug of the mfolfirinox regimen in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Nicolas Fraunhoffer
Session: Poster session 22