Abstract 1670P
Background
PDAC is highly associated with thrombotic risk, with reported incidences up to 40%. Although tumoral (TT) and non-tumoral thrombosis (nonTT) are frequently treated equally, they might have different impact in prognosis and survival. Khorana and ONKOTEV score can predict thrombotic risk in this scenario.
Methods
Retrospective study that includes 204 patients with PDAC treated with chemotherapy and visited in the Medical Oncology Department of a third-level hospital in Barcelona between January 2014 and December 2021. The main objective was to describe the frequency of TT and nonTT, the ability to predict thrombotic risk by predictive scores using ROC curve and to analyze survival associated with thrombosis and rethrombosis.
Results
We identified 62 patients with thrombosis (30.4%) of a total of 204. Median age was 70 years (48-92), 54.8% were males, and 62% presented stage IV at diagnosis. TT involved 71% of thrombotic events being the most frequent in all stages (80% in resectable, 83.3% in borderline, 75% in locally advanced and 66.7% in metastatic disease). Predominant thrombotic events were splenic (39%) and superior mesenteric vein (32%) for TT and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in lower extremities and pulmonary embolisms in non-tumoral scenario (56% and 22.2% respectively). The ONKOTEV score presented better predictive capacity compared to Khorana for nonTT (AUC 0.731 vs 0,670 in ROC curves). Neither of both scores demonstrated predictive capacity for TT (AUC 0.540 vs 0.495). Thromboembolic events were associated with reduced overall survival (OS; HR 0.71, p 0.034). Median OS was 12.5 months in patients who presented nonTT vs 7.2 months for those with TT (HR 0.48, p=0.326). Rethrombosis occurred in 8% (5 cases), 2 of them being on anticoagulant therapy. All were in the same location as previously.
Conclusions
TT was more frequent than nonTT in our cohort. Thromboembolic events, including TT and nonTT, were detrimental for survival without statistically significant differences between them. ONKOTEV score has a greater capacity to predict nonTT compared to Khorana, in order to identify patients who could potentially benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1569P - The CODRP model for predicting drug sensitivity in patient-derived 3D gastric cancer cells
Presenter: Dong Woo Lee
Session: Poster session 22
1571P - Exploration of immune and metabolism gene signature for prognosis of esophageal carcinoma and establishment of a combined prediction model
Presenter: Hao Wu
Session: Poster session 22
1572P - Impact of HER2 and PD-L1 co-expression in Claudin18.2 positive resectable gastroesophageal cancers
Presenter: Antonella Cammarota
Session: Poster session 22
1573P - Involved field and elective nodal irradiation presented similar treatment efficiency in concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced ESCC
Presenter: Baosheng Li
Session: Poster session 22
1575P - Factors associated with uptake of adjuvant nivolumab in a nationwide esophageal cancer patient cohort
Presenter: Rob Verhoeven
Session: Poster session 22
1577P - Prior antibiotic administration disrupts outcomes of PD-1 blockade in advanced gastric cancer by altering gut microbiome and systemic immune response
Presenter: Chang Gon Kim
Session: Poster session 22
1578P - Effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic gastric cancer: A real-world evidence study
Presenter: Francesco Puccetti
Session: Poster session 22