Abstract 2111P
Background
Psychometric assessment tools are widely available but underutilized in daily oncology practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of multiple psychometric scales in identifying cancer patients in distress who need Psycho-Oncology management.
Methods
Colorectal cancer patients were prospectively asked to complete a survey including 3 psychometric scales (GAD-7, PHQ-9, PC-PTSD-5). Those scoring high on at least one scale (GAD-7 score ≥ 10, PHQ-9 score ≥ 10, PC-PTSD-5 score ≥ 4) were offered referral to the Psycho-Oncology service. Those accepting the referral were further triaged by members of this service via a standardized semi-structured interview. Patients were divided into three groups: those accepted by the Psycho-Oncology service, those declined the referral and those discharged from the service with no need for further intervention. Outcomes were compared with the analysis of variance test (ANOVA).
Results
Fifty-four patients (30 females) of median age 60 years (range 36-81) were prospectively evaluated. 20 patients (37%) reported their cancer was under control, 15 (28%) believed they had progressive disease, while 19 (35%) were uncertain. Approximately half patients (26; 48%) referred a prior history of a mental condition. The mean (±SE) scores for each psychometric scale were 10.96 (± 0.78), 12.79 (± 0.82), and 1.07 (± 0.21), respectively for GAD-7, PHQ-9, PC-PTSD-5. Thirty-four patients (63%) scored high on GAD-7, 40 (74%) on PHQ-9 and 8 (15%) on PC-PTSD-5. Almost half of the patients declined a referral (25, 46%), 22 (41%) were assessed by a Psycho-Oncologist and managed accordingly and 7 (13%) were discharged after the initial tirage. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean psychometric scores between the three identified groups (p<0.05).
Conclusions
Psychometric scales are useful screening tools to identify distress but cannot differentiate between general distress and psychological/psychiatric symptoms requiring specialist intervention. Psychometric scales should be used in conjunction with semi-structured interviews. The ‘screen and triage’ model should be further investigated as part of an integrated care model, to signpost cancer patients to appropriate support services.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Servier.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2105P - Prophylactic role of a postbiotic microbiota-stabilizer on abemaciclib-induced diarrhea in breast cancer patients: A pilot application study
Presenter: Rita De Sanctis
Session: Poster session 06
2106P - Safety and patient reported outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with cancer
Presenter: Amy Body
Session: Poster session 06
2107P - Thromboprophylaxis with intermediate or prophylactic doses of LMWHs in ambulatory cancer patients
Presenter: Nikolaos Tsoukalas
Session: Poster session 06
2108P - Vitamin B12 and its clinical relevance in hospitalized cancer patients
Presenter: Stefano Maccarone
Session: Poster session 06
2109P - Vitamin A, D and E levels in patients with solid tumors undergoing palliative systemic cancer treatment
Presenter: Julia Berger
Session: Poster session 06
2112P - Initial geriatric assessment and chemotherapy tolerability treatment in Brazilian patients with malignant neoplasm of the digestive system
Presenter: Marcos Dumont Bonfin Santos
Session: Poster session 06
2113P - Efficacy and effectiveness of prophylactic magnesium supplementation on prevention of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Caio Castro
Session: Poster session 06
2114P - Impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in the management of chemotherapy toxicity in older cancer patients
Presenter: Jordi Recuero-Borau
Session: Poster session 06
2115P - Pre-cachexia incidence in patients with solid cancer: A cross-sectional study
Presenter: Lynn Gottmann
Session: Poster session 06