Abstract 2111P
Background
Psychometric assessment tools are widely available but underutilized in daily oncology practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of multiple psychometric scales in identifying cancer patients in distress who need Psycho-Oncology management.
Methods
Colorectal cancer patients were prospectively asked to complete a survey including 3 psychometric scales (GAD-7, PHQ-9, PC-PTSD-5). Those scoring high on at least one scale (GAD-7 score ≥ 10, PHQ-9 score ≥ 10, PC-PTSD-5 score ≥ 4) were offered referral to the Psycho-Oncology service. Those accepting the referral were further triaged by members of this service via a standardized semi-structured interview. Patients were divided into three groups: those accepted by the Psycho-Oncology service, those declined the referral and those discharged from the service with no need for further intervention. Outcomes were compared with the analysis of variance test (ANOVA).
Results
Fifty-four patients (30 females) of median age 60 years (range 36-81) were prospectively evaluated. 20 patients (37%) reported their cancer was under control, 15 (28%) believed they had progressive disease, while 19 (35%) were uncertain. Approximately half patients (26; 48%) referred a prior history of a mental condition. The mean (±SE) scores for each psychometric scale were 10.96 (± 0.78), 12.79 (± 0.82), and 1.07 (± 0.21), respectively for GAD-7, PHQ-9, PC-PTSD-5. Thirty-four patients (63%) scored high on GAD-7, 40 (74%) on PHQ-9 and 8 (15%) on PC-PTSD-5. Almost half of the patients declined a referral (25, 46%), 22 (41%) were assessed by a Psycho-Oncologist and managed accordingly and 7 (13%) were discharged after the initial tirage. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean psychometric scores between the three identified groups (p<0.05).
Conclusions
Psychometric scales are useful screening tools to identify distress but cannot differentiate between general distress and psychological/psychiatric symptoms requiring specialist intervention. Psychometric scales should be used in conjunction with semi-structured interviews. The ‘screen and triage’ model should be further investigated as part of an integrated care model, to signpost cancer patients to appropriate support services.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Servier.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2126P - Exercise implementation into a clinic setting with 1.660 cancer patients: Real-world data from eight years oncological exercise therapy in Cologne (OTT)
Presenter: Timo Niels
Session: Poster session 06
2127P - Long-term yoga reduces the side effects of systemic therapies and improves arm symptoms in the breast cancer patients
Presenter: Mayank Jain
Session: Poster session 06
2128P - exerCise discussion with Oncologist duriNg caNcEr ConsultaTion: The CONNECT study
Presenter: Sara Pilotto
Session: Poster session 06
2129P - Feasibility of a virtual exercise program to mitigate decline in physical function for advanced lung cancer patients
Presenter: Ying Wang, Sarah Yeo
Session: Poster session 06