Abstract 1109P
Background
At the 3-y follow-up of KEYNOTE-151 (NCT02821000), second-line pembro showed manageable safety and clinically meaningful antitumor activity in Chinese pts with advanced melanoma. Results from more than 5 y of follow-up are presented.
Methods
Adults who had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic melanoma, who were of Chinese descent, and whose disease progressed with first-line therapy received pembro 2 mg/kg IV Q3W for ≤35 cycles (∼2 y) or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pts with SD or better who discontinued pembro could receive a second course of pembro (≤17 cycles) upon disease progression. Primary end points were safety and tolerability and ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points were DOR and PFS per RECIST v1.1 and irRECIST by BICR, ORR per irRECIST by BICR, and OS. Safety and OS were analyzed in pts who received ≥1 dose of pembro. Other efficacy end points were assessed in pts who received ≥1 dose of pembro and had measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 at baseline.
Results
One hundred three pts received pembro (102 with measurable disease at baseline). Median age was 52 y, 57.3% of the pts were female, 51.5% had PD-L1 positive disease, and 14.6% had mucosal melanoma. Median follow-up at data cutoff (Nov 30, 2022) was 73.2 mo (IQR, 67.6-74.8). No new safety signals were reported. Grade 3-5 treatment-related AEs occurred in 12.6% of pts; no pts died of treatment-related AEs. ORR per RECIST v1.1 was 17.6% (95% CI, 10.8-26.4; 1 CR, 17 PR); DCR was 38.2% (95% CI, 28.8-48.4). Median DOR per RECIST v1.1 was 13.8 mo (range, 2.7-69.4+); an estimated 37.7% of pts had DOR ≥60 mo. Median PFS was 2.8 mo (95% CI, 2.7-3.5); 60-mo PFS was 5.0%. One additional pt had PR per irRECIST (ORR, 18.6%; 95% CI, 11.6-27.6). Median OS was 13.2 mo (95% CI, 10.4-16.5); 60-mo OS was 13.4%. One pt with PR as the best overall response per RECIST v1.1 received second-course pembro.
Conclusions
After more than 5 y of follow-up, second-line pembro continued to show manageable safety and clinically meaningful antitumor activity in Chinese pts with advanced melanoma. These results support the continued use of pembro in this population.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02821000.
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing and/or editorial assistance was provided by Jemimah Walker, PhD, and Rob Steger, PhD, of ApotheCom (Yardley, PA, USA).
Legal entity responsible for the study
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Funding
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Disclosure
L. Si: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, Novartis, Oriengene, Roche, Shanghai Junshi Biosciences; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, Novartis, Shanghai Junshi Biosciences. S. Diede: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Merck. S.S. Chen, H. Hu: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: MSD. J. Guo: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Bayer, Novartis, Simcere, Shanghai Junshi Biosciences, Oriengene. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1110P - A phase II clinical trial of SHR-1701 combined with temozolomide for advanced melanoma
Presenter: Tu Hu
Session: Poster session 13
1111P - A randomised phase II study of intermittent versus continuous dosing of targeted therapy in patients with BRAFV600 mutant advanced melanoma (INTERIM)
Presenter: Avinash Gupta
Session: Poster session 13
1112P - Five-year survival after intermittent targeted therapy and anti-PD1 in stage IV melanoma: An update of the IMPemBra trial
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1113P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (enco) + binimetinib (bini) vs vemurafenib (vemu) or enco in patients (pts) with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma
Presenter: Dirk Schadendorf
Session: Poster session 13
1114P - Encorafenib (E) plus binimetinib (B) in unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma, real-world evidence in Spain (GEM 2002 - BECARE)
Presenter: Ainara Soria Rivas
Session: Poster session 13
1115P - Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of dabrafenib/trametinib versus vemurafenib/cobimetinib therapy in routine medical practice: Eight years of BRAF/MEK inhibitor use in routine clinical practice
Presenter: Karolina Piejko
Session: Poster session 13
1116P - Long term outcome of complete responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or target therapy (TT) in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster session 13
1117P - Overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO+BINI): Comparing real-world vs clinical trial data
Presenter: Gino In
Session: Poster session 13
1118P - Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with BRAF+ metastatic melanoma refractory to first-line immunotherapy
Presenter: Thach-Giao Truong
Session: Poster session 13
1119P - Stage IIIA melanoma with isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes: Time for reviewing the AJCC v8 classification
Presenter: Teresa Amaral
Session: Poster session 13