Abstract 1663P
Background
Recently, the use of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) somatic assays has increased aiming the identification of potentially targetable molecular alterations for the treatment of advanced malignancies that progressed after standard therapies. Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains a challenging disease, with poor outcomes, for which novel therapeutic strategies, are largely warranted. Nevertheless, the impact of NSG for the treatment and outcomes of this neoplasia is unclear. The aimed to assess the impact of NGS somatic assays for patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Methods
In this cohort, we evaluated pts with advanced PC (metastatic or locally advanced unresectable) treated in a private cancer network from 2014 to 2021. Electronic records were reviewed for data collection. The study endpoints were the pattern of somatic alterations, the frequency of potentially targetable alterations and the use of targeted therapy directed by the NGS somatic assay.
Results
Among 446 pts with advanced PC, 51 underwent a NGS somatic panel; 44 of them had the panel results available and were evaluated in this study. All pts with panel available had at least one somatic alteration. Most pts (95%) had KRAS mutations; the most common were KRAS G12D (52%), KRAS G12V (17%), KRAS G12R (9%), KRAS G12A (7%), and KRAS Q61H (5%). No patient had a KRAS G12C mutation that could be targeted with anti-KRAS G12C agents. Other frequent molecular alterations were found in the following genes: TP53 (52%), CDKN2A/B (41%), SMAD4 (18%), ARID1A (11%), PTEN (7%), and ATM (4%). Two pts had a BRCA2 mutation that was known to be germline. No patient had microsatellite instability-high or high tumor mutational burden. Overall, 11% had potentially drugable alterations. Only one patient (2%) received a treatment guided by the result of the somatic panel, with a median progression-free survival of 1.6 months.
Conclusions
Unfortunately, NGS somatic panel seems to have limited role for the PC treatment nowadays, with few pts receiving treatment guided by the panel. The development of new targeted therapy directed to the most frequently molecular alterations, including KRAS-directed therapy other than KRAS G12C, are urgently needed to improve outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1569P - The CODRP model for predicting drug sensitivity in patient-derived 3D gastric cancer cells
Presenter: Dong Woo Lee
Session: Poster session 22
1571P - Exploration of immune and metabolism gene signature for prognosis of esophageal carcinoma and establishment of a combined prediction model
Presenter: Hao Wu
Session: Poster session 22
1572P - Impact of HER2 and PD-L1 co-expression in Claudin18.2 positive resectable gastroesophageal cancers
Presenter: Antonella Cammarota
Session: Poster session 22
1573P - Involved field and elective nodal irradiation presented similar treatment efficiency in concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced ESCC
Presenter: Baosheng Li
Session: Poster session 22
1575P - Factors associated with uptake of adjuvant nivolumab in a nationwide esophageal cancer patient cohort
Presenter: Rob Verhoeven
Session: Poster session 22
1577P - Prior antibiotic administration disrupts outcomes of PD-1 blockade in advanced gastric cancer by altering gut microbiome and systemic immune response
Presenter: Chang Gon Kim
Session: Poster session 22
1578P - Effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic gastric cancer: A real-world evidence study
Presenter: Francesco Puccetti
Session: Poster session 22