Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 22

1663P - Role of next-generation sequencing somatic assays in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 22

Topics

Targeted Therapy;  Molecular Oncology

Tumour Site

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Presenters

Rafaela Naves

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S895-S924. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01944-0

Authors

R. Naves, M. Naves, T.S.C.D. Almeida, R. Colombo Bonadio, C. Motta Venchiarutti Moniz, P.M. Hoff

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, 04501-000 - São Paulo/BR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1663P

Background

Recently, the use of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) somatic assays has increased aiming the identification of potentially targetable molecular alterations for the treatment of advanced malignancies that progressed after standard therapies. Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains a challenging disease, with poor outcomes, for which novel therapeutic strategies, are largely warranted. Nevertheless, the impact of NSG for the treatment and outcomes of this neoplasia is unclear. The aimed to assess the impact of NGS somatic assays for patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Methods

In this cohort, we evaluated pts with advanced PC (metastatic or locally advanced unresectable) treated in a private cancer network from 2014 to 2021. Electronic records were reviewed for data collection. The study endpoints were the pattern of somatic alterations, the frequency of potentially targetable alterations and the use of targeted therapy directed by the NGS somatic assay.

Results

Among 446 pts with advanced PC, 51 underwent a NGS somatic panel; 44 of them had the panel results available and were evaluated in this study. All pts with panel available had at least one somatic alteration. Most pts (95%) had KRAS mutations; the most common were KRAS G12D (52%), KRAS G12V (17%), KRAS G12R (9%), KRAS G12A (7%), and KRAS Q61H (5%). No patient had a KRAS G12C mutation that could be targeted with anti-KRAS G12C agents. Other frequent molecular alterations were found in the following genes: TP53 (52%), CDKN2A/B (41%), SMAD4 (18%), ARID1A (11%), PTEN (7%), and ATM (4%). Two pts had a BRCA2 mutation that was known to be germline. No patient had microsatellite instability-high or high tumor mutational burden. Overall, 11% had potentially drugable alterations. Only one patient (2%) received a treatment guided by the result of the somatic panel, with a median progression-free survival of 1.6 months.

Conclusions

Unfortunately, NGS somatic panel seems to have limited role for the PC treatment nowadays, with few pts receiving treatment guided by the panel. The development of new targeted therapy directed to the most frequently molecular alterations, including KRAS-directed therapy other than KRAS G12C, are urgently needed to improve outcomes.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.