Abstract 1492P
Background
Due to the widespread uptake of 6-weekly Pembrolizumab (6wklyP) in the COVID-19 era, this audit attempts to clarify differences in clinically relevant immune therapy related adverse events (irAEs) between 6wklyP and traditional 3-weekly Pembrolizumab (3wklyP).
Methods
Oncology patients at the Gold Coast University Hospital with Advanced Melanoma or Metastatic Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received single agent 3wklyP 200mg, 6wklyP 400mg or those who sequentially received 3wklyP followed by 6wklyP between 2017-2022 were analysed for frequency of clinically significant (Grade3-4) irAEs. Total time of immunosuppression for treatment of irAEs was recorded. Data was extracted from the electronic medical record and analysed using Cox-proportion hazard analysis.
Results
In total, 69 and 112 patients received 6wklyP and 3wklyP respectively. There were 52 patients with Melanoma and 129 patients with NSCLC. 30 patients received sequential treatment. Average observation time for toxicity was 327 days for 6wklyP and 352 days for 3wklyP. 17/69 (24.6%) patients who received 6wklyP developed Grade 3-4 irAEs compared with 9/112 (8%) 3wklyP patients (HR of 3.03; CI 1.34-6.83, p= 0.007). Grade 1-4 irAEs were 32/69 (46.4%) with 6wklyP and 31/112 (27.7%) with 3wklyP. 6/30 (20%) patients who received 6wklyP after initially receiving 3wklyP had Grade 3-4 irAEs (HR 0.56, CI 0.24-1.37; p= 0.187). Mean immunosuppression time for treatment of Grade 3-4 irAEs for 6wklyP and 3wklyP was 91 days and 55 days respectively (p =0.76). 6/17 (35.3%) 6wklyP patients required Steroid sparing agents to treat their Grade3-4 irAEs compared to 1/9 (11.1%) 3wklyP patients.
Conclusions
6wklyP was associated with significantly higher immune therapy related adverse events than 3wklyP. Sequential delivery of 6wklyP after 3wklyP did not significantly alter clinically significant adverse effects. Immunosuppressive management of irAEs were not statistically different between arms however there was a higher rate of steroid sparing immunomodulation requirement with 6wklyP.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1535P - Paclitaxel + ramucirumab versus paclitaxel alone in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the oesophagus, refractory or intolerant to combination therapy with fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based drugs: Final results from the randomized phase II IKF-S627/RAMOS trial of the AIO
Presenter: Magdalena Scheck
Session: Poster session 21
1536P - HERIZON: A phase II study of HER-Vaxx (IMU-131), a HER2-targeting peptide vaccine plus standard of care chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ advanced stomach cancer - Dose-dependent anti-cancer antibodies correlating with improved clinical outcome
Presenter: Joshua Tobias
Session: Poster session 21
1537P - A phase I study of pevonedistat plus capeOX in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to platinum (NCCH-1811)
Presenter: Daisuke Takahari
Session: Poster session 21
1540P - Tislelizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective, phase II clinical study
Presenter: Yi Zhang
Session: Poster session 21
1541P - Neoadjuvant therapy of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients (pts) with resectable esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC)
Presenter: Yinjun Dong
Session: Poster session 21
1542P - Updated results of a phase II clinical trial: Paclitaxel and carboplatin plus PD-1 blockades combined with anlotinib as first-line treatment for advanced oesophageal cancer
Presenter: Mingfang Xu
Session: Poster session 21