Abstract 1492P
Background
Due to the widespread uptake of 6-weekly Pembrolizumab (6wklyP) in the COVID-19 era, this audit attempts to clarify differences in clinically relevant immune therapy related adverse events (irAEs) between 6wklyP and traditional 3-weekly Pembrolizumab (3wklyP).
Methods
Oncology patients at the Gold Coast University Hospital with Advanced Melanoma or Metastatic Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received single agent 3wklyP 200mg, 6wklyP 400mg or those who sequentially received 3wklyP followed by 6wklyP between 2017-2022 were analysed for frequency of clinically significant (Grade3-4) irAEs. Total time of immunosuppression for treatment of irAEs was recorded. Data was extracted from the electronic medical record and analysed using Cox-proportion hazard analysis.
Results
In total, 69 and 112 patients received 6wklyP and 3wklyP respectively. There were 52 patients with Melanoma and 129 patients with NSCLC. 30 patients received sequential treatment. Average observation time for toxicity was 327 days for 6wklyP and 352 days for 3wklyP. 17/69 (24.6%) patients who received 6wklyP developed Grade 3-4 irAEs compared with 9/112 (8%) 3wklyP patients (HR of 3.03; CI 1.34-6.83, p= 0.007). Grade 1-4 irAEs were 32/69 (46.4%) with 6wklyP and 31/112 (27.7%) with 3wklyP. 6/30 (20%) patients who received 6wklyP after initially receiving 3wklyP had Grade 3-4 irAEs (HR 0.56, CI 0.24-1.37; p= 0.187). Mean immunosuppression time for treatment of Grade 3-4 irAEs for 6wklyP and 3wklyP was 91 days and 55 days respectively (p =0.76). 6/17 (35.3%) 6wklyP patients required Steroid sparing agents to treat their Grade3-4 irAEs compared to 1/9 (11.1%) 3wklyP patients.
Conclusions
6wklyP was associated with significantly higher immune therapy related adverse events than 3wklyP. Sequential delivery of 6wklyP after 3wklyP did not significantly alter clinically significant adverse effects. Immunosuppressive management of irAEs were not statistically different between arms however there was a higher rate of steroid sparing immunomodulation requirement with 6wklyP.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1489P - To investigate the differences in efficacy between immunotherapy and combined immunotherapy in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Ye Mao
Session: Poster session 21
1490P - Removal of TNF-Rs frees TNF-α’s anticancer activity alone or in combination chemo- or immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC
Presenter: Mustafa Bozkurt
Session: Poster session 21
1491P - PD-L1 TPS ≥50% predicts durable response after discontinuing immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients
Presenter: Jeongmin Seo
Session: Poster session 21
1493P - A phase II, multi-center, open-label, dose-optimization study evaluating telomere targeting agent THIO sequenced with cemiplimab in patients with advanced NSCLC: Preliminary results
Presenter: Tomasz Jankowski
Session: Poster session 21
1495P - Cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥1%: EMPOWER-Lung 3 results
Presenter: Ana Baramidze
Session: Poster session 21
1496P - Higher levels of CSF-1 support resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Paul Takam Kamga
Session: Poster session 21
1497P - Gut microbiome is associated with the clinical response to anti-PD-1 based immunotherapy in untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Presenter: Yawen Bin
Session: Poster session 21
1498P - HGF/MET pathway is associated with poor efficacy of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced-stage NSCLC
Presenter: Assya Akli
Session: Poster session 21