Abstract 942P
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and platinum-based chemotherapy are the standard treatments of R/M SCCHN patients (pts). After progression on these therapies, there is a lack of data and no standard of care exists.
Methods
This is a multicentric retrospective study (3 French and 3 Swiss centers). We analyzed the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel alone (P) or in combination with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody cetuximab (PC) beyond ICI progression in platinum-refractory and taxane naïve R/M SCCHN pts treated from January 2016 to August 2022. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria.
Results
We included 152 pts treated with P (69 pts, 45%) or PC (83 pts, 55%): 73% were males, 81% smokers. Median age was 67 (24-86). The ORR was 45% in the total population (TP), 22.4% in P group and 63.5% in PC group (p<0.001). The disease control rate (DCR) was 68.5% in the TP, 56.7% in P group and 78.1% in PC group (p=0.007). The median overall survival was 8.0 months (m) [95% CI: 7.0-9.4] in the TP, 6.9 m [95% CI: 5.5-8.2] in the P group and 9.4 m [95% CI: 8.0-11.8] in the PC group (p=0.02). The median progression free survival was 4.0 m [95% CI: 3.3-4.7] in the TP, 2.8 m [95% CI: 2.5-3.7] in the P group and 4.9 m [95% CI: 4.3-5.7] in the PC group (p<0.001). The rate of G3/G4 adverse event (AE) was 18.8% in P group and 21.7% in PC group. One patient died of septic shock in PC group. The most common G3/G4 AE were neuropathy (8.6%) in P group and acneiform rash (10%) in PC group. Table: 942P
Response Rate according to type of treatment CR: Complete response; PR: Partial response; SD: Stable disease; PD: Progressive disease; NE: Not evaluable
Total population N=152 | Paclitaxel N=69 | Paclitaxel-Cetuximab N=83 | |
CR | 4 (2.7%) | 1 (1.5%) | 3 (3.7%) |
PR | 63 (42.3%) | 14 (20.9%) | 49 (59.8 %) |
SD | 35 (23.5%) | 23 (34.3%) | 12 (14.6%) |
PD | 47 (31.5%) | 29 (43.3%) | 18 (22%) |
NE | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Conclusions
Taxane-based chemotherapy is highly active and well-tolerated after ICI failure in platinum-refractory R/M SCCHN pts. Our results suggest a potential additional benefit of cetuximab combined with paclitaxel in this population and deserves further investigation in prospective randomized clinical trials.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
CHUV - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
E. Auclin: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board: Amgen, Sanofi. C. Gervais: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, mundipharma, astellas, janssen. V.G. Espeli: Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Merck-Serono, Merck Sharp&Dohme; Non-Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Sanofi. S.I. Rothschild: Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: AstraZeneca, Roche Pharma AG, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer, Janssen Oncology, Otsuka, PharmaMar, Sanofi/Aventis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Serono, Roche Pharma AG. C. Even: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Innate Pharma, Merck Serono; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: F Star Therapeutics, Novartis, Elevar; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: BMS, AstraZeneca, ISA pharmaceutics, MSD, Debiopharma, Ayala, Gilead; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: BMS, Novartis, sanofi. V. Cristina: Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Merck Sharp&Dohme, Merck-Serono; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Eisai; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Eli Lilly, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Merck Sharp&Dohme, Merck-Serono, MaxiVAX. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
921P - HB-200 arenavirus-based immunotherapy plus pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic HPV16 positive head and neck cancer
Presenter: Lisle Nabell
Session: Poster session 12
922P - Dose expansion results of the bifunctional EGFR/TGFβ inhibitor BCA101 with pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent, metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Glenn Hanna
Session: Poster session 12
923P - Phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab combined with vorinostat in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head & neck squamous cell carcinoma – subgroup analysis of the PEVOsq basket trial
Presenter: Christophe Le Tourneau
Session: Poster session 12
924P - Polyfunctional HPV16-Specific T cell responses in subjects receiving PDS0101 and pembrolizumab combination treatment for recurrent/metastatic HPV16-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)
Presenter: Kevin Harrington
Session: Poster session 12
925P - Treatment discontinuation of immune checkpoint blockade in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma experiencing complete or nearly complete remission
Presenter: Konrad Klinghammer
Session: Poster session 12
926P - UK national real-world outcome data of first-line pembrolizumab treatment in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC)
Presenter: Ifigenia Vasiliadou
Session: Poster session 12
927P - Patients (pts) with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) treated with nivolumab (NIVO) in the first-line (1L) or later-line (2L+) settings in Germany: Updated results from the real-world HANNA study
Presenter: Boris Kubuschok
Session: Poster session 12
928P - Prognostic value of body composition and nutritional assessment in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (R/M SCCHN) treated with immunotherapy (IO)
Presenter: Zara Vidales Sepulveda
Session: Poster session 12
930P - Platinum and taxane (PT) plus immunotherapy versus immunotherapy alone in patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck cancer (HNSCC)
Presenter: Marcelo Bonomi
Session: Poster session 12