Abstract 942P
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and platinum-based chemotherapy are the standard treatments of R/M SCCHN patients (pts). After progression on these therapies, there is a lack of data and no standard of care exists.
Methods
This is a multicentric retrospective study (3 French and 3 Swiss centers). We analyzed the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel alone (P) or in combination with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody cetuximab (PC) beyond ICI progression in platinum-refractory and taxane naïve R/M SCCHN pts treated from January 2016 to August 2022. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria.
Results
We included 152 pts treated with P (69 pts, 45%) or PC (83 pts, 55%): 73% were males, 81% smokers. Median age was 67 (24-86). The ORR was 45% in the total population (TP), 22.4% in P group and 63.5% in PC group (p<0.001). The disease control rate (DCR) was 68.5% in the TP, 56.7% in P group and 78.1% in PC group (p=0.007). The median overall survival was 8.0 months (m) [95% CI: 7.0-9.4] in the TP, 6.9 m [95% CI: 5.5-8.2] in the P group and 9.4 m [95% CI: 8.0-11.8] in the PC group (p=0.02). The median progression free survival was 4.0 m [95% CI: 3.3-4.7] in the TP, 2.8 m [95% CI: 2.5-3.7] in the P group and 4.9 m [95% CI: 4.3-5.7] in the PC group (p<0.001). The rate of G3/G4 adverse event (AE) was 18.8% in P group and 21.7% in PC group. One patient died of septic shock in PC group. The most common G3/G4 AE were neuropathy (8.6%) in P group and acneiform rash (10%) in PC group. Table: 942P
Response Rate according to type of treatment CR: Complete response; PR: Partial response; SD: Stable disease; PD: Progressive disease; NE: Not evaluable
Total population N=152 | Paclitaxel N=69 | Paclitaxel-Cetuximab N=83 | |
CR | 4 (2.7%) | 1 (1.5%) | 3 (3.7%) |
PR | 63 (42.3%) | 14 (20.9%) | 49 (59.8 %) |
SD | 35 (23.5%) | 23 (34.3%) | 12 (14.6%) |
PD | 47 (31.5%) | 29 (43.3%) | 18 (22%) |
NE | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Conclusions
Taxane-based chemotherapy is highly active and well-tolerated after ICI failure in platinum-refractory R/M SCCHN pts. Our results suggest a potential additional benefit of cetuximab combined with paclitaxel in this population and deserves further investigation in prospective randomized clinical trials.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
CHUV - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
E. Auclin: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board: Amgen, Sanofi. C. Gervais: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, mundipharma, astellas, janssen. V.G. Espeli: Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Merck-Serono, Merck Sharp&Dohme; Non-Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Sanofi. S.I. Rothschild: Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: AstraZeneca, Roche Pharma AG, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer, Janssen Oncology, Otsuka, PharmaMar, Sanofi/Aventis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Serono, Roche Pharma AG. C. Even: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Innate Pharma, Merck Serono; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: F Star Therapeutics, Novartis, Elevar; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: BMS, AstraZeneca, ISA pharmaceutics, MSD, Debiopharma, Ayala, Gilead; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: BMS, Novartis, sanofi. V. Cristina: Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Merck Sharp&Dohme, Merck-Serono; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Eisai; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Eli Lilly, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Merck Sharp&Dohme, Merck-Serono, MaxiVAX. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
899P - Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on treatment and survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients (IMPACCT Study)
Presenter: Berta Vilar Anglada
Session: Poster session 12
900P - COVID-19 in patients with head and neck cancers (HERODOTUS): An international, registry-based, cohort study
Presenter: Amanda Psyrri
Session: Poster session 12
901P - Gut microbiome metagenomics and toxicity outcomes from chemoradiation therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Antoine Desilets
Session: Poster session 12
902P - Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in head and neck cancer: The patterns and prediction
Presenter: Chiaki Suzuki
Session: Poster session 12
903P - AL101 therapy in patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC): Final ACCURACY trial results and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes
Presenter: Renata Ferrarotto
Session: Poster session 12
904P - Retrospective analysis of adjuvant systemic anti-hormonal therapy for resected androgen receptor-positive (AR+) salivary duct carcinoma (SDC)
Presenter: Jetty Weijers
Session: Poster session 12
905P - Hot topics in salivary gland carcinomas treatment: An EORTC young investigator and early career investigator survey
Presenter: Luigi Lorini
Session: Poster session 12
906P - Multi-parameter flow cytometry analysis of circulating immune cell populations in recurrent/metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma
Presenter: Samuel Rack
Session: Poster session 12
907P - Radiosensitivity signature in adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of salivary glands origin is associated with ACC type II
Presenter: Laura Locati
Session: Poster session 12
908P - Efficacy of NOTCH inhibitors (Ni) relative to prior systemic therapy or observation in patients (pts) with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC)
Presenter: Camilla Hoff
Session: Poster session 12