Abstract 942P
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and platinum-based chemotherapy are the standard treatments of R/M SCCHN patients (pts). After progression on these therapies, there is a lack of data and no standard of care exists.
Methods
This is a multicentric retrospective study (3 French and 3 Swiss centers). We analyzed the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel alone (P) or in combination with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody cetuximab (PC) beyond ICI progression in platinum-refractory and taxane naïve R/M SCCHN pts treated from January 2016 to August 2022. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria.
Results
We included 152 pts treated with P (69 pts, 45%) or PC (83 pts, 55%): 73% were males, 81% smokers. Median age was 67 (24-86). The ORR was 45% in the total population (TP), 22.4% in P group and 63.5% in PC group (p<0.001). The disease control rate (DCR) was 68.5% in the TP, 56.7% in P group and 78.1% in PC group (p=0.007). The median overall survival was 8.0 months (m) [95% CI: 7.0-9.4] in the TP, 6.9 m [95% CI: 5.5-8.2] in the P group and 9.4 m [95% CI: 8.0-11.8] in the PC group (p=0.02). The median progression free survival was 4.0 m [95% CI: 3.3-4.7] in the TP, 2.8 m [95% CI: 2.5-3.7] in the P group and 4.9 m [95% CI: 4.3-5.7] in the PC group (p<0.001). The rate of G3/G4 adverse event (AE) was 18.8% in P group and 21.7% in PC group. One patient died of septic shock in PC group. The most common G3/G4 AE were neuropathy (8.6%) in P group and acneiform rash (10%) in PC group. Table: 942P
Response Rate according to type of treatment CR: Complete response; PR: Partial response; SD: Stable disease; PD: Progressive disease; NE: Not evaluable
Total population N=152 | Paclitaxel N=69 | Paclitaxel-Cetuximab N=83 | |
CR | 4 (2.7%) | 1 (1.5%) | 3 (3.7%) |
PR | 63 (42.3%) | 14 (20.9%) | 49 (59.8 %) |
SD | 35 (23.5%) | 23 (34.3%) | 12 (14.6%) |
PD | 47 (31.5%) | 29 (43.3%) | 18 (22%) |
NE | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Conclusions
Taxane-based chemotherapy is highly active and well-tolerated after ICI failure in platinum-refractory R/M SCCHN pts. Our results suggest a potential additional benefit of cetuximab combined with paclitaxel in this population and deserves further investigation in prospective randomized clinical trials.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
CHUV - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
E. Auclin: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board: Amgen, Sanofi. C. Gervais: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, mundipharma, astellas, janssen. V.G. Espeli: Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Merck-Serono, Merck Sharp&Dohme; Non-Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Sanofi. S.I. Rothschild: Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: AstraZeneca, Roche Pharma AG, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer, Janssen Oncology, Otsuka, PharmaMar, Sanofi/Aventis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Serono, Roche Pharma AG. C. Even: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Innate Pharma, Merck Serono; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: F Star Therapeutics, Novartis, Elevar; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: BMS, AstraZeneca, ISA pharmaceutics, MSD, Debiopharma, Ayala, Gilead; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: BMS, Novartis, sanofi. V. Cristina: Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Merck Sharp&Dohme, Merck-Serono; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Eisai; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Eli Lilly, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Merck Sharp&Dohme, Merck-Serono, MaxiVAX. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
909P - TROP2 expression in salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC): A new potential therapeutic target for the non-solid subtype
Presenter: Juliana Mota Siqueira
Session: Poster session 12
910P - Machine learning-based survival prediction model for postoperative parotid mucoepidermoid carcinoma
Presenter: Chen Zihan
Session: Poster session 12
911P - Post-radiotherapy (RT) Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA dynamics identifies optimal timepoint for stratification of high-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)
Presenter: Janice Ser Huey Tan
Session: Poster session 12
912P - Toripalimab in combination with anlotinib in previously treated recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: The interim analysis of the single-arm, phase II TORAL study
Presenter: QingQing Cai
Session: Poster session 12
916P - Reducing radiation-induced temporal lobe injury by changing tumor prescription dose in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Presenter: Xiao Xiao
Session: Poster session 12
917P - Radiation-induced nasopharyngeal necrosis in locally-recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after re-radiotherapy
Presenter: Runda Huang
Session: Poster session 12
918P - SPP1-related M2 macrophage signatures predict prognosis and immunotherapy response in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Presenter: Li Ying
Session: Poster session 12
919P - A prognostic model of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on 18F-FDG PET-CT radiomic parameters and clinical characteristics of patients
Presenter: Wu xi
Session: Poster session 12
920P - Envafolimab plus chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), a prospective, single-armed phase II trial
Presenter: Xiaohui Wang
Session: Poster session 12